No one said they would vote for Hillary. But if the Republicans nominate Condi, and she is "mildly pro-choice," we will regretfully vote for a third-party candidate or not vote at all.
And so will several million other pro-lifers who gave Bush their votes last November.
This is NOT an issue we will, or can, compromise on. If conservatives with more libertarian views want to see a conservtive in the White House, then they will have to compromise on this issue.
"But if the Republicans nominate Condi, and she is "mildly pro-choice," we will regretfully vote for a third-party candidate or not vote at all. And so will several million other pro-lifers who gave Bush their votes last November."
That will only serve to marginalize your influence in the party. We don't need you as much as you think we do.
Fine...if Ashcroft runs, I'll vote for him...If Jerry Falwell is the Republican candidate...I'll vote for him.
As long as the Democratic Party remains controlled by leftists, I will vote Republican.
Will you join me?
This thread is a great reminder of the importance of primaries, and the need for the party to stay the hell out of them and let the voters decide.
If some of the people on this thread are our "friends", the Stupid Party is in deeper trouble than I previously thought.