Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for the 'FairTax'
Wall Street Journal Online ^ | March 7, 2005 | Laurence J. Kotlikoff

Posted on 03/08/2005 9:20:44 AM PST by n-tres-ted

Our tax code is a mess for a reason. Special interests pay for special favors. And with 17,000 pages and counting, there's plenty of places for our politicians to hide the kickbacks. Meanwhile, all the exemptions, deductions, exceptions and special provisions reduce the tax base, which means higher tax rates and smaller incentives for individuals and companies to produce income. And whether the tax breaks are set in fine print or spelled out in bold type, they generally favor the rich, making our tax system less progressive than is generally believed.

No tax system is perfect, but ours is so awful that fundamental reform is the only option. Fundamental reform is not just a necessity; it's also an opportunity to stop taxing income and start taxing consumption. My colleagues and I have been studying income and consumption taxation via computer simulations for some time now. We've found that switching from taxing wage and capital income to taxing consumption can significantly improve economic efficiency and growth. What's more, it can make our tax system much more progressive and generationally equitable.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fairtax; kotlikoff; taxes; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 501-506 next last
To: ancient_geezer; groanup

Here we go again!


61 posted on 03/08/2005 10:25:50 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal
For some reason they believe achievers should be the keepers of others. I do not understand or tolerate this mentality in the least.

I am in total agreement.
62 posted on 03/08/2005 10:26:29 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." —Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: camle
already with the "exemptions/rebates! how long before the politicians errode those "reimbursements" into nothingness?

And your grand solution to tax reform is?
63 posted on 03/08/2005 10:27:18 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." —Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

"All consumption taxes, including sales taxes, discourage consumption."

And all income taxes discourage production. Given that economists are virtually unanimous in their concern that our rate of savings and investment is too low, how would you propose addressing that without affecting consumption?


64 posted on 03/08/2005 10:29:27 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
If you're paying 23% sales tax for a widget, and you earn $30,000 per year, the sales tax is taking a bigger bite out of your income than if you earn $100,000 per year. That's regressive.

You haven't read the whole plan.

What is your solution?
65 posted on 03/08/2005 10:29:38 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." —Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded
I don't care if they tax all of my consumption if I get all of my income.

If that is the case, then you will have less gross income then you net now, and the government will also have less gross revenue. That's the real world effect of an NRST.

66 posted on 03/08/2005 10:30:04 AM PST by elbucko (A Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: camle
already with the "exemptions/rebates! how long before the politicians errode those "reimbursements" into nothingness?

How long before some government employee tells me that I have to pay a higher percentage than those that earn less than me or they'll come after me with a gun?
How long before they drain my bank account because they think I haven't paid enough?
How long before I have to sit in jail because some government employee thought that my production would better serve someone I don't know?
How long before some government worker decides that the money I have somehow been able to keep away from them will serve someone else (not of my choosing) after I die?

67 posted on 03/08/2005 10:30:43 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: willgolfforfood

It's obvious you didn't read the article.


68 posted on 03/08/2005 10:31:40 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

"The NRST is an inherently regressive form of taxation that is truly despotic."

Hey, Willie, how is your proposal to replace corporate income taxes with import tariffs coming along? How many supporters do you have for it so far?


69 posted on 03/08/2005 10:32:13 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

count all income as income. tax everybody at the same rate. simple and really fair. more like Steve Forbe's flat tax.


70 posted on 03/08/2005 10:32:15 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I've also suggested lowering the tax rate instead of offering rebates. (Rebates are taxpayers money the government shouldn't have taken to begin with.)

I do like this alternative, but I agree that gub'mint does like to make some people eternally dependent. Unfortunately, you will always have those in society who have absolutely no drive whatsoever. What is the proper way to handle them?
71 posted on 03/08/2005 10:32:23 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." —Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
And all income taxes discourage production.

No they don't!

There is a paradox involving taxing income vs taxing consumption.

72 posted on 03/08/2005 10:33:48 AM PST by elbucko (A Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

That's the same thread I liked to above in post 26 where Willie Green and I had an in depth discussion. It was a great thread and a must read for everyone concerned with taxation.


73 posted on 03/08/2005 10:33:56 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
If you're paying 23% sales tax for a widget, and you earn $30,000 per year, the sales tax is taking a bigger bite out of your income than if you earn $100,000 per year. That's regressive.

Boo frickin' hoo.

74 posted on 03/08/2005 10:34:59 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
It ain't the tax code, it's the spending.

The tax code and it's method of collection minimize the pain of paying taxes.

Eliminating withholding would help control spending IMO.

This nrst does that.

75 posted on 03/08/2005 10:35:12 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

"Still launching personal attacks...."

"..all you NRST shills..."

Does anyone else beside me see the irony in this?


76 posted on 03/08/2005 10:35:23 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

why not tax everybody at the same rate - AND count all income the same (cap gains, dividends, etc.)


77 posted on 03/08/2005 10:35:23 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

I cast my vote for the FairTax!


78 posted on 03/08/2005 10:35:25 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Freedom. Brought to you by the grace of God and the Red, White and Blue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
Hey, Willie, how is your proposal to replace corporate income taxes with import tariffs coming along?

Snicker. You're just mean, man. Mean I say.

79 posted on 03/08/2005 10:37:39 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: camle

Income taxes, flat or otherwise, are fundamentally flawed from their inception...one of the key planks of the Communist Manifesto.

If you go out into the pasture, find a cowpie, and flatten it, IT IS STILL A COWPIE!


80 posted on 03/08/2005 10:38:04 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Freedom. Brought to you by the grace of God and the Red, White and Blue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 501-506 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson