Skip to comments.
Oldest biped skeleton discovered - new evolution record, 1.2 millions added in one day
http://cooltech.iafrica.com/science/421933.htm ^
| Mon, 07 Mar 2005
Posted on 03/07/2005 3:19:42 PM PST by Truth666
A joint Ethiopian-US team of palaeontologists announced on Saturday they had discovered the world's oldest biped skeleton to be unearthed so far, dating it to between 3.8 and four million years old.
"This is the world's oldest biped," Bruce Latimer, director of the natural history museum in Cleveland, Ohio, told a news conference in the Ethiopian capital, adding that "it will revolutionise the way we see human evolution".
The bones were found three weeks ago in Ethiopia's Afar region, at a site some 60 kilometres from Hadar where Lucy, one of the first hominids, was discovered in 1974. Researchers at the site in northeast Ethiopia have in all unearthed 12 hominid fossils, of which parts of one skeleton were discovered.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: evolution; fauxiantroll; fauxiantrolls; youngearthdelusion; youngearthdelusions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 581-593 next last
To: FastCoyote
The good old suggestion trick: using the expression "tons of earth" and suggesting that people protesting evolution lies contest that there are dinosaur bones buried under earth.
21
posted on
03/07/2005 3:50:25 PM PST
by
Truth666
(http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
To: PatrickHenry
22
posted on
03/07/2005 3:50:57 PM PST
by
dayton law dude
(I've got the temper of an Irishman and the stubbornness of a German!)
To: Truth666
23
posted on
03/07/2005 3:52:51 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: FastCoyote
Given the speed at which Mt. St. Helens deposited new sediment, and the rate at which we see our current topography changing, fakery may not be so difficult. ( I don't believe they are faking the bone finds however)So, I am far more skeptical of any dating process. Remember also, It takes millions of years for a diamond to be created, right? ;^)
24
posted on
03/07/2005 3:54:11 PM PST
by
pipecorp
('E must be the king. Why? 'E ain't got sh@t all over 'im.)
To: Truth666
Please add me to any PING lists also...
To: gcampbell
What other theory would you recommend? Evolutionary science is pretty central to the study modern biology and genetics.
_____________________________________________________________
Snapping of fingers.
To: Truth666
dating it to between 3.8 and four million years old In a related story, Anna Nicole Smith has offered the biped a lap dance...
27
posted on
03/07/2005 4:06:48 PM PST
by
Luddite Patent Counsel
("Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx)
To: Truth666
So now man was on the earth almost 4,000,000 years and didn't manage to leave a significant trace until the last 6,000-10,000 years. Yeah right.
28
posted on
03/07/2005 4:08:22 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: AntiGuv
29
posted on
03/07/2005 4:10:52 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: Truth666
How does one read this sentence "Researchers at the site in northeast Ethiopia have in all unearthed 12 hominid fossils, of which parts of one skeleton were discovered" ? What's left to be fossilized if it's not skeletal? Are teeth and jaw bones
conclusive enough to be from a hominid? Poor writing at best.
To: gcampbell
"Evolutionary science is pretty central to the study modern biology and genetics."Evolution called a lot of DNA "junk DNA". Had scientists listened to them, they might have quit investigating.
Evolution called various human organs and features "vestigal" and some medical people believed them. We now know that there are no vestigal organs in the human body that do not have function.
Evolution really contributes very little to science and the study of God's design. In some cases it actually gets in the way.
31
posted on
03/07/2005 4:14:45 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Truth666
32
posted on
03/07/2005 4:16:01 PM PST
by
Disambiguator
(Encouraging heteronormativity wherever I go!)
To: Truth666
Another date for slick willy.
33
posted on
03/07/2005 4:19:09 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again.)
To: DannyTN
and God said , enough of them monkeys roaming around, I am putting some people on this earth to clean the mess up. And here we are.
or
are all those monkoids deteriorated, degenerated democrats? Keep digging deeper, there should more older bones there. Seriesly!
To: Truth666
Son, your desperate attempts to disparage evolution are becoming tiresome. Better learn some science.
To: FastCoyote
So you think dinosaur bones are fake? Well, that's not a good starting place if you want to understand creation.
36
posted on
03/07/2005 4:33:27 PM PST
by
TaxRelief
(Support the Troops Rally, Fayetteville, NC -- March 19, 2005)
To: FastCoyote
>Then they
bury the fake bones under tons of earth that they lay down in sedimentary layers to fool stupid people
|
That would be stupid! They BEAM the bones underground with a transporter!
|
To: DannyTN
Evolution called a lot of DNA "junk DNA". Had scientists listened to them, they might have quit investigating. so who exactly are "evolution" as opposed to "scientists".
|Do you have any idea what percentage of "junk" DNA has a known function?
And which creation scientists are at work decoding the function of the rest Name some of them.
38
posted on
03/07/2005 4:52:34 PM PST
by
js1138
To: Coyoteman
If we evolved from monkeys and apes, why are there still monkeys and apes? Or better yet, why aren't there creatures on the earth right now that are in a state of evolution a quarter of the way, half-way, or 3/4ths of the way between an ape and a human? Wouldn't we have some primate like that living somewhere in the world, with which we could communicate and reason on a level not quite human but advanced significantly beyond the other primates? Something that maybe even has a partially developed moral sense? Or did evolution just suddenly stop?
39
posted on
03/07/2005 5:11:45 PM PST
by
Zhangliqun
(What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
To: js1138
I don't believe that we have only been on Earth 2-3000 years but 4,000,000? Did the guy have an expired dry cleaning receipt in his pocket? Where are the signs that this guy or anybody else existed? Its a little suspicious that we have managed to evolve society so far in the past couple thousand years while we did virtually nothing for nearly 4,000,000? And physically we are virtually unchanged in the past couple thousand years but we were freaking fish only 10,000,000 years ago? Something about all this smells.
I think I prefer the theory that aliens dropped us here a few thousand years ago to avoid shipping charges on the way to another universe. As soon as they get the tariffs reduced, they will come back and pick us up.
40
posted on
03/07/2005 5:15:01 PM PST
by
bpjam
(I don't know what a neo-con is and neither does anybody else.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 581-593 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson