Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States Race to Cut Taxes to Attract Intel Corp.
Yahoo News/Reuters ^ | March 7, 2005 | Daniel Sorid

Posted on 03/07/2005 12:46:52 PM PST by QQQQQ

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Intel Corp. (Nasdaq:INTC - news), the world's largest chip maker, is offering U.S. states the promise of dollars of capital investment in exchange for an overhaul of their tax laws, which it says are making the United States less competitive than other regions of the world.

The Santa Clara, California-based company is now heavily lobbying officials in Arizona and Oregon for tax cuts that could save the company tens of millions of dollars a year in property and income taxes.

At the same time, executives have begun speaking out more forcefully about the lure of China, Singapore and Malaysia, whose governments are offering free land and tax holidays to Intel to build its first Asian factory in their borders.

Critics say Intel is playing local governments off of one another to reduce its state tax burden to virtually nothing.

"We call it the race to the bottom," said Michael Mazerov, a policy analyst at the nonpartisan Center on Budget & Policy Priorities, in Washington, D.C. "The companies have gotten very sophisticated at pitting localities against each other in a bidding war."

Intel executives say they can only be expected to push for competitive tax laws when other regions offer so much. The company points to a report it sponsored that shows its presence creates a "multiplier effect" on local economic growth. Executives also hint the company can always pick up and leave.

"If we don't invest, we don't pay taxes anyway," Steven Grant, the vice president in charge of Intel's factory network, said in a recent interview.

Intel will spend about $5 billion this year on its factory network.

SATISFYING THE CHIP GIANT

Local officials sound eager to satisfy the chip maker.

"We want to be progressive and keep Intel happy, and keep the jobs here," said Boyd Dunn, the mayor of Chandler, Arizona, a suburb of Phoenix where Intel employs around 10,000 people. Intel last month expanded preliminary plans to build one or two additional factories in the city.

Dunn said he supports a bill making its way through the state legislature that would significantly trim Intel's state income taxes. The bill would change the state's tax code to assess corporate income taxes based on in-state sales, rather than a combination of sales and local payroll. For a company like Intel, with a large state payroll but relatively small in-state chip sales, the law would be an economic boon.

In Oregon, Intel is seeking to renew a property tax shield called a Strategic Investment Program that is set to expire in 2014, and which it said it needs to remain competitive if it is to invest further in Oregon.

Intel, Oregon's largest private employer, says it is quickly approaching the program's cap of $12.5 billion in high-tech investment, and is now seeking to raise the investment limit to $25 billion.

Even with the property tax abatement, Intel says it pays more property taxes in Oregon -- it paid $11 million in 2001, the only year Intel publicly discussed -- than the next five highest-paying companies together. It says it is penalized for investing in high-tech equipment that increases property value but requires no additional municipal services.

"It becomes an absurd amount versus almost any other business in the area," Grant said. "Equipment doesn't demand services or schooling."

Intel has already won tax relief from a third state, New Mexico, which last year granted Intel an industrial revenue bond akin to the Oregon program worth an estimated $2 billion to the chip maker.

OVERSEAS ATTRACTIONS

While the United States tries to retain its competitive advantage in manufacturing, Intel says overseas governments regularly offer tempting incentives.

Ireland was prepared to give Intel an incentive package of around $225 million for building two factories in a city west of Dublin. Last week, the proposal was withdrawn after the European Union (news - web sites) said they were prepared to block the deal on the grounds that it violated rules on state aid.

Intel, which has already invested nearly 4.5 billion euros, or about $6 billion, in Ireland since it arrived in 1989, has made rumblings that the move could affect future investment in the country.

"We'll factor this development into future plans for increasing investment in Ireland," a spokeswoman for Intel in Ireland said.

The wild card may be Asia.

Due to a combination of export restrictions and the availability of skilled labor, Intel could not yet easily build a chip factory in China, the world's fastest-growing market for chips.

But the company has said it is looking.

"You look at some of the great opportunities -- free land, tax holidays," Grant said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: govwatch; intc; intel; taxes
Taxes matter. The socialists who keep wanting to tax businesses and "the rich" more and more, should learn from this: businesses and "the rich" can just leave their state or even the US, and stop paying taxes, then the states or the US not only get nothing in taxes, but lose the jobs and taxes of the people who work for those businesses.
1 posted on 03/07/2005 12:46:54 PM PST by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer

Another reason for Fairtax PING.


2 posted on 03/07/2005 12:47:29 PM PST by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ

Who wants to bet that at least one person on this thread that's going to object to this is also one of the people who complains about Chinese imported goods? Any takers, anybody at all? I'll even give you odds.


3 posted on 03/07/2005 12:48:59 PM PST by discostu (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ
Critics say Intel is playing local governments off of one another to reduce its state tax burden to virtually nothing.

Which is fine in principle - it helps remind governments that they exist to serve, not rule. But it takes a company with Intel's clout to make this happen - small or medium-sized firms have to pay the taxes or move away. Perhaps smaller companies need to band together into coalitions and refuse to operate in certain munipalities until tax laws are reformed.

4 posted on 03/07/2005 12:50:14 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ
If the socialist tax and spend lunatics went unchecked, I would be on a 5 year waiting list for a state of the art abacus.

Go Intel!!! The beauty and magic of capitalism at work.

5 posted on 03/07/2005 1:04:40 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ

Doesn't look like Sacremento wants to play "Lets Make a Deal".


6 posted on 03/07/2005 1:06:27 PM PST by Semper Paratus (:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ
Corporations don't pay taxes, only people pay taxes. They can only collect em from you in lower wages and higher prices and pass them onto government.

Better that everyone knows the tax they really pay instead of what government allows the voter to see.

A Taxreform bump for you all.

If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

John Linder in the House(HR25) & Saxby Chambliss Senate(S25), offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and SS/Medicare payroll taxes outright, and provide a IRS free replacement in the form of a retail sales tax:

H.R.25,S.25
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer for additional information:


7 posted on 03/07/2005 1:12:04 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu; Willie Green
Who wants to bet that at least one person on this thread that's going to object to this is also one of the people who complains about Chinese imported goods? Any takers, anybody at all? I'll even give you odds.

I bet Willie Green will!!!

8 posted on 03/07/2005 1:17:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Who wants to bet that at least one person on this thread that's going to object to this is also one of the people who complains about Chinese imported goods?

I definitely object to our easy trade policy with the butchers of Beijing. However, I have no objection to Intel getting the best deal stateside it can. I believe that AMD has lots going on in Asia, and if Intel needs tax breaks to be competitive, more power to them. This is especially true in their area: cutting-edge technology in computer processors and chip sets (these have U.S. security implications). While I think IBM's cell will be a headache for Intel (Itanium is a dud, thus far), I have always found their branded motherboards and processors to be reliable (at least since the 486-66DX2).

Actually, I would like to see a state (or states) give a great deal to Intel AND to less wealthy and powerful small companies, and watch the bustling activity and growth!
9 posted on 03/07/2005 1:17:14 PM PST by sittnick (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ
"Taxes matter. "

An available labor force also matters. We've aborted forty million Americans this generation and population growth of citizens is approaching zero.

10 posted on 03/07/2005 1:27:58 PM PST by bayourod (Unless we get over 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ
Cutting marginal tax rates across the board for everyone is a great idea.

Giving special tax breaks to corporations that lobby for them is a terrible idea.

11 posted on 03/07/2005 1:56:10 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ

Regardless what you think about it, it's getting hard to deny that corporations run our government.


12 posted on 03/07/2005 9:29:03 PM PST by sixmil (In Free Trade We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson