Although Kevorkian played the part of someone who cared for the ill and dying, his actions eventually revealed him for the selfish sicko that he is. That's why I don't appreciate being called that name. On the other hand, I don't have a problem at all stating that I believe people have the right to receive assistance if needed to find peace from a life they don't want, in a way that they can manage. I believe it is compassionate to assist in truly voluntary situations...Although I respect those who worry about a slippery slope into involuntary euthanasia, I think we could come up with safeguards, and it's my belief that the socialist control-freak do-gooders are actually just trying to block all euthanasia.
So, for Terri, are you AGREEING that Terri should NOT be MURDERED just because her BIGAMIST-father-of-two-BASTARD-children-possible-BOTCHED-ATTEMPTED-MURDERER-not-legally-qualified-guardian-husband Michael WANTS HER DEAD?
Are you AGREEING that since Terri CHOSE NOT TO LIMIT HER ACCESS TO MEDICAL AND OTHER SUPPORTIVE CARE, that Terri SHOULD have HER wish to NOT LIMIT her access to medical and supportive care?