Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Orders 'Enemy Combatant' Jose Padilla Charged Or Released
The Carolina Channel.com ^ | February 28, 2005 | TheCarolinaChannel

Posted on 02/28/2005 3:20:44 PM PST by MisterRepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-355 last
To: JimRed

So does releasing his name, which the government has already done.


341 posted on 03/01/2005 12:45:10 PM PST by FactsMatter (:) Howlin owes me an Apology :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

There is sure to be a huge group who think American citizens should be denied their constitutional rights when the mood fits.


342 posted on 03/01/2005 12:46:00 PM PST by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

Correct. Supposedly we're in a war to protect our freedoms.

There's a large segment here who are willing to abandon our freedoms to win the war.

Pretty oxymoronic, eh?


343 posted on 03/01/2005 12:50:23 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

three people have been charged in this war on terrorism as enemy combatants. has the government made honest claims about the conduct of these persons to classify them as such? you say you don't trust them; fine, have they provided an honest presentation three times? because if they can't, given the thousands and thousands of other cases where the government brings charges against citizens, we are in alot of trouble.


344 posted on 03/01/2005 3:02:18 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

that is nonsense, no one is saying Padilla should not get a military tribunal.


345 posted on 03/01/2005 3:08:08 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

what is Bush going to, order the military guards at the brig to shoot them? that's not an exaggeration, that's what would happen.


346 posted on 03/01/2005 3:10:10 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64

the judicial branch isn't going to protect any citizens in the domestic war on terror - the judicial system is incapable of doing that. we have to put some faith in the executive branch, or we will be hit again.


347 posted on 03/01/2005 3:13:27 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07; oceanview

Gentlemen, I have read this entire thread and have learned much from your posts. Thank you for your patience with all of those who attacked your point of view WITHOUT having read the thread. And thank you for bringing your obvious knowledge and expertise to FR.

(Of course maybe I'm just saying this because I agree with you... and because I want the US to survive this war.) :-)


348 posted on 03/01/2005 3:13:39 PM PST by Shazolene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Dog
This isn't some cocktail party chit chat Judge......Padilla was going to set off a dirty bomb.

If so, he should be charged with same.

Lest we forget, the Sixth Amendment was based in part on the fact that the British had a habit of arresting people, and holding them in prison for long periods, without charging them.

349 posted on 03/01/2005 3:17:26 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shazolene

we will all recognize abuse when we see it - others with differing opinions on this thread fear the abuse of power. that is a legitimate fear, but lets at least some evidence that its happening before we pull the rug out from under this enemy combatant process.

what gets me is that the same people put blind faith in the judiciary - our most unaccountable and biased branch of government. they are willing to turn these decisions over to their discretion. why? these are the same people who today found some new constitutional right for immunity from captial punishment for Lee Malvo. this is who I am supposed to put my faith in?


350 posted on 03/01/2005 3:20:11 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

he will be charged and tried, by the military tribunal. if Padilla would drop his appeals, the tribunal could get underway. why do you think his ACLU lawyers want a criminal trial for him?


351 posted on 03/01/2005 3:21:19 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: RKV

"Yeah I read Quinn and I thought it was a mistake not to try the one who was a citizen."

But we did try him. Hung him too.

"This is just too much power for a President, and particularly so when war has not been declared."

War has been declared. The constitution does not specify a specific format or specific words. And, from an international perspective, once you attack another country you've declared war.

"We could easily end up a banana republic if a politician like Hilary was to win the presidency."

Fiddlesticks. Probably the worst argument against what we've done. Hillary will do any damn thing she pleases if elected regardless of what we do or do not do.


352 posted on 03/01/2005 3:30:19 PM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Shazolene; Torie; jwalsh07
Yesterday I inquired as to why "Bush was responsible" and never received a response. I also referred to the contract Josè signed with al-Qaeda in July of 2000.

I'm waiting for a reaction to the Nazi American citizens who were executed and have yet to read anything about FDR's "oriental lock-up".

Ask yourself if Bush is more concerned about what's eventually done with Josè than he is with the information this guy has spilled. Charge Josè, he goes to court, and that intelligence becomes public record, available to the enemy.

353 posted on 03/01/2005 5:49:50 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection (www.whatyoucrave.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican; All
Those who want to read Judge Floyd's Memorandum and Opinion, here it is. This is a link to the South Carolina District Court's PDF document. Document

Very interesting reading.

SCDC Full Padilla Case Docket Sheet

354 posted on 03/02/2005 3:30:07 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nebr FAL owner
I believe that Padilla effectively renounced his citizenship when he took up arms against us. He can't have it both ways. His type want to do anything they can to harm the US, but when they are caught they start to cry "No, wait! I'm an American citizen! I have rights!" Well, BS! You leave our country and take up arms against it and you are no longer a citizen of our country.

As for listening to anything that might be spewed from the syphilitic minds of those troglodites over at DU, well I don't have a hot enough shower to get clean after a visit to that hell-hole. They are the minority in this country, even if they scream the loudest. Losers all.

355 posted on 03/02/2005 5:30:24 AM PST by Pablo64 ("Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-355 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson