Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Orders 'Enemy Combatant' Jose Padilla Charged Or Released
The Carolina Channel.com ^ | February 28, 2005 | TheCarolinaChannel

Posted on 02/28/2005 3:20:44 PM PST by MisterRepublican

SPARTANBURG -- A federal judge in Spartanburg has ordered that an American citizen held as an enemy combatant in a Navy brig in Charleston should be charged with a crime or released.

U.S. District Judge Henry F. Floyd ruled Monday that the president of the United States does not have the authority to order Jose Padilla to be held indefinitely without being charged.

"If the law in its current state is found by the president to be insufficient to protect this country from terrorist plots, such as the one alleged here, then the president should prevail upon Congress to remedy the problem," he wrote.

In the ruling, Floyd said that three court cases that the government used to make its claim did not sufficiently apply to Padilla's case.

Floyd wrote that, in essence, "the detention of a United States citizen by the military is disallowed without explicit Congressional authorization."

Floyd wrote that because the government had not provided any proof that the president has the power to hold Padilla, he must reject the government's claim of authority.

"To do otherwise would not only offend the rule of law and violate this country’s constitutional tradition, but it would also be a betrayal of this nation’s commitment to the separation of powers that safeguards our democratic values and individual liberties," he wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at thecarolinachannel.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: almuhajir; detainees; dirtybombplot; enemycombatant; gogallows; muhajir; ourfriendelectricity; padilla; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-355 next last
To: MisterRepublican
"If the law in its current state is found by the president to be insufficient to protect this country from terrorist plots, such as the one alleged here, then the president should prevail upon Congress to remedy the problem," he wrote.

I agree. This isn't some foreigner. We're talking about a US citizen, a despicable one perhaps, but a US citizen nonetheless.

Some of you on this thread sound like you're advocating suspending the Bill of Rights.

Paticularly :

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

21 posted on 02/28/2005 3:37:09 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Well we should just release Padilla.

No one's saying that -- at least I'm not.

I'm saying, charge him. Convict him. Maybe even execute him.

But, treat him the way American citizens are treated when charged with a crime.

22 posted on 02/28/2005 3:37:15 PM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

BINGO!


23 posted on 02/28/2005 3:37:34 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Well we should just release Padilla.

Why do you oppose trial by jury? Do you also oppose election of our political leaders? What else about America do you hate?

24 posted on 02/28/2005 3:37:47 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
If I were held in prison without being charged for years, I'd have a severe problem with that.

The DOJ needs to explain why he hasn't been charged.

25 posted on 02/28/2005 3:38:21 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

Tricky situation, but I feel the right choice was made.


26 posted on 02/28/2005 3:38:26 PM PST by FierceKulak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fast1
What harm will come from charging a US Citizen? That is all the judge is saying they Government has to do, is it really to much to ask that US citizens know what charges they face?
27 posted on 02/28/2005 3:39:16 PM PST by FactsMatter (:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
"No, this one was appointed by George W. Bush, unfortunately."

In that case, maybe George needs to invite him down to the ranch in Texas and teach him what the "woodshed" is all about.

28 posted on 02/28/2005 3:39:24 PM PST by Pablo64 ("Everything I say is fully substantiated by my own opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog
What is your objection to letting US Citizens know what crimes they are accused of? We are not talking foreign nationals here.
30 posted on 02/28/2005 3:40:13 PM PST by FactsMatter (:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FactsMatter
What harm will come from charging a US Citizen? That is all the judge is saying they Government has to do, is it really to much to ask that US citizens know what charges they face?

You got your 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendment rights when we say you got em.

31 posted on 02/28/2005 3:41:18 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Do you also oppose election of our political leaders? What else about America do you hate?

Excuse me...?

What if Padilla had set off the dirty bomb....what would your reaction be then..

HUH?

32 posted on 02/28/2005 3:41:51 PM PST by Dog (FReepers-- - -- --- We are a battery of 80,000 bullsh*t-seeking missiles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Padilla was going to set off a dirty bomb.

The Constitutional requirement is to prove this allegation via due process. Is that reaaly too much to ask?

33 posted on 02/28/2005 3:42:05 PM PST by sourcery (Resistance is futile: We are the Blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

Thanks for the reminder. Hope a few of the folks here will take the trouble to read the Constitution.


34 posted on 02/28/2005 3:42:16 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dog

My reaction would be that he should be charged, tried before a jury then executed for his actions.

But I must ask what that has to do with the government holding a US citizen with out letting him know what charges he faces.


35 posted on 02/28/2005 3:43:48 PM PST by FactsMatter (:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FactsMatter
What is your objection to letting US Citizens know what crimes they are accused of?

He would have set that bomb off.......does it matter what country he came from.......not to me.....he gets a free trip to Gitmo.

36 posted on 02/28/2005 3:43:51 PM PST by Dog (FReepers-- - -- --- We are a battery of 80,000 bullsh*t-seeking missiles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

That line of thinking invites abuse. Hillary would love the be able to do that when she becomes president.


37 posted on 02/28/2005 3:44:13 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
The Constitutional requirement is to prove this allegation via due process.

The Constitution isn't a suicide pact..

38 posted on 02/28/2005 3:45:07 PM PST by Dog (FReepers-- - -- --- We are a battery of 80,000 bullsh*t-seeking missiles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Are their any other portions of the USCON that you wish to ignore?


39 posted on 02/28/2005 3:45:10 PM PST by FactsMatter (:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dog
What if Padilla had set off the dirty bomb....what would your reaction be then..

Apprehend him.

Charge him.

Convict him.

Execute him.

All while obeying the Bill of Rights.

We have the tools we need in place already, bud. Don't let's fix wot ain't broken.

40 posted on 02/28/2005 3:45:16 PM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson