Posted on 02/20/2005 3:32:14 PM PST by neverdem
GENDER STUDIES
In Victorian times, scientists argued that women's brains were too small to be fully human. On the intelligence scale, researchers recommended classifying human females with gorillas.
The great 19th century neuroanatomist Paul Broca didn't see the situation as quite so dire, but he warned his colleagues that women were not capable of being as smart as men, "a difference that we should not exaggerate, but which is nonetheless real."
The president of Harvard University suggested that a lack of "innate ability" might help explain why women couldn't keep up with men in fields like math and science … oh, wait, that one happened just last month.
Hold for a minute — OK — while I dig out my corset and bustle.
If that sounds snotty, I mean it to be.
I, for one, am ready to leave the 19th century behind. Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers can apologize all he wants, but the fact is that — from a position of power — he felt comfortable speculating about women's inadequate intelligence and ignoring years worth of science that proved him wrong.
I don't find that excusable. Period.
And I wonder why we women are so willing to tolerate this kind of behavior.
Summers raised the issue of women's lesser capabilities in an economic conference in Cambridge, Mass., in mid-January. And the most consistent response from women — the one still resonating across the country — is defensiveness.
A litany of female scholars quote studies proving that, yes, we girls can do long division, actually understand a chemical formula, comprehend a physical law or two and not only become professional scientists but do good work.
In fact, when allowed, women have done excellent science for decades, even since the corset-and-bustle days. The physicist Marie Curie won....
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
You know, he probably would've had it easier. If more women entered engineering, math and science, more of them might have worked in the WTC as minions of capitalism and the left could lick it's chops!
But alas, no. They will grind an issue from the musings of the president of Harvard.
Why don't men stop and ask for directions? Because they are so smart? I think not!
uh hu
Come on...I don't think you're a troll, I think you're 18. There are a lot of wise people who post here, and they'll catch on too. Keep talking, please.
#443
Judith; WELL SAID!
Thanks. ;-D
I would appreciate you using the proper spelling of my name. Using an intentionally incorrect spelling/meaning can very well be considered an insult/attack.
Did you take my advice on the other thread about not using personal attacks? JimRob doesn't look kindly on that sort of thing. Calling someone an ***hole is an attack. I had the post removed but can bring it up again if it evades your memory.
Ladies...she is someone's daughter...can't we be a little kinder?
For a newbie, you sure are in attack mode.
Furthermore,
This is not an official letter. And Mrs. Tiggywinkle is not your real name.
Learn to spell my name correctly. Thank you.
I suggest you do a little research before coming to conclusions. Thank you.
pinging some of the ladies/gents you most likely meant your post for, other than me.
You intentionally misspelled my name, Lauralee. And how do you *know* it's not my real name. Hmmmmm?
It seems you and I are in a minority on this one.
That was my original thought, until I caught some of your posts...on reflection, it would be a waste of time.
You assume much but seemingly know very little.
I guarantee I know more college women than you do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.