Replies

However, Glover did some research of his own, and discovered that Patterson is a lesbian in a relationship with a female partner, and the couple has three children between them. The pro-family advocate said Patterson has an obvious agenda and is using her title as a psychologist to put forth one-sided propaganda.

So if a Christian does a report on church-going families, it's "obvious propaganda"? He should stick to contesting the assertions she makes.

-Eric

He should stick to contesting the assertions she makes.

Psycology is but subjective opinion with underlying motivation. 'She' challenges history -her assertions are a crime -as such, motive is a consideration...

So if a Christian does a report on church-going families, it's "obvious propaganda"?

She is basically saying that her kids are happy growing up in a Lesbian parented family. Isn't that just a little biased?

Do you think there is a chance in Hell that she will state that she is doing her children harm by cohabiting with a fellow Thespian? If you do, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell ya.

Eric: "He should stick to constesting the assertions she makes."
Joe: "She actually writes books on how lesbians can manipulate the law in order to have double adoption processes so they can create these lesbian so-called 'families,'" he said. Patterson, he added, is a radical homosexual activist "who has a clear agenda to redefine what a family is or should be."

I believe he just did Eric...

Eric,
Did you even think that post through before you wrote it? Comparing Homosexuals raising children to Christians going to church isn't even apples to oranges, its apples to Volvos.
The point is that homosexuals are the "scientists" producing the studies that say its perfectly okay for homosexuals (themselves) to raise children.
What if it isn't Eric? What if its not okay?

Would you want Phillip Morris running study's on the effects of second hand smoke? Do you want Power companies studying the effects of high voltage wires and its links to cancer? Do you want Fossil Fuel companies running the studies on the human influence on Global Warming. Or maybe to bring it back around to religion, would you want the catholic church releasing studies on whether or not pedophilia is a problem in the church?
Why don't you think a little.
I saw a bumper stick that was about as shallow as your post. it read, "An eye for an eye would leave the whole world blind." Your post makes about that much sense.

Well said. I don't care if she's a Hooverheifer--if the methodology is sound, the study will be.

Now, odds are pretty good it's lousy study (since 99% of the sociological studies out are done by and for liberals), but I'd prefer to see the methodology to confirm it.

So if a Christian does a report on church-going families, it's "obvious propaganda"? He should stick to contesting the assertions she makes.

Ethically, she should have laid her "lifestyle choice" out on the table when presenting the results of the study. It would have, therefore, come under additional scrutiny as a result. The fact that she didn't is at least unethical. If I had to guess, I'd wager that she "cooked" the results.