To: E Rocc
Eric,
Did you even think that post through before you wrote it? Comparing Homosexuals raising children to Christians going to church isn't even apples to oranges, its apples to Volvos.
The point is that homosexuals are the "scientists" producing the studies that say its perfectly okay for homosexuals (themselves) to raise children.
What if it isn't Eric? What if its not okay?
Would you want Phillip Morris running study's on the effects of second hand smoke? Do you want Power companies studying the effects of high voltage wires and its links to cancer? Do you want Fossil Fuel companies running the studies on the human influence on Global Warming. Or maybe to bring it back around to religion, would you want the catholic church releasing studies on whether or not pedophilia is a problem in the church?
Why don't you think a little.
I saw a bumper stick that was about as shallow as your post. it read, "An eye for an eye would leave the whole world blind." Your post makes about that much sense.
15 posted on
02/15/2005 1:04:21 PM PST by
ReeseKev27
(Liberalism = Idealism; Conservative = Realism - I'd rather deal in the real world)
To: ReeseKev27
The point is that homosexuals are the "scientists" producing the studies that say its perfectly okay for homosexuals (themselves) to raise children. What if it isn't Eric? What if its not okay?I believe the point is that this study was, presumably, accompanied by some evidence to support it's conclusion and that it might be more useful to examine that evidence than to make ad hominem assertions of bias.
To: ReeseKev27
"Extensive testing has proven that testing works!"
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson