Skip to comments.
Outcast Star Zooms Out of Milky Way Galaxy
Reuters ^
| Feb 8, 2005
| Deborah Zabarenko
Posted on 02/08/2005 10:16:16 PM PST by anymouse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last

Thankfully the astronomer who spotted this wayward star didn't "shake it like a poloroid." ;)
1
posted on
02/08/2005 10:16:17 PM PST
by
anymouse
To: RadioAstronomer; Brett66; KevinDavis
2
posted on
02/08/2005 10:17:01 PM PST
by
anymouse
To: anymouse
So you can't help but wonder what would happen should the Earth get swallowed by a black hole. Kinda puts all of humanity's problems in an eerie perspective, doesn't it?
3
posted on
02/08/2005 10:28:05 PM PST
by
Caged in Canuckistan
(A message from Canada: GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!)
To: anymouse
The outcast is going so fast -- over 1.5 million mph -- that astronomers believe it was lobbed out of the galaxy by the tremendous force of a black hole thought to sit at the Milky Way's center.Holy cats!! Isn't that well past the speed of light (186,000 mph)? So what happened to all the nay-sayers who have said that nothing could travel faster than the speed of light? Pass the crow, gentlemen ....
4
posted on
02/08/2005 10:44:29 PM PST
by
Hetty_Fauxvert
(http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
186,000 mphMake that per second.
5
posted on
02/08/2005 10:47:25 PM PST
by
BikerTrash
(Enough already with the carnival freak show...bring back COOL!)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
The speed of light is 186,000 miles per second.
6
posted on
02/08/2005 10:47:28 PM PST
by
Paul_Denton
(The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN!)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
That would be 186,000 miles per second, not hour, for the speed of light.
7
posted on
02/08/2005 10:48:01 PM PST
by
spodefly
(Yo, homey ... Is that my briefcase?)
To: spodefly
I'm slow ... goin to bed now ... at 186,000 microns per hour.
8
posted on
02/08/2005 10:48:59 PM PST
by
spodefly
(Yo, homey ... Is that my briefcase?)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
Speed of light is 670,600,000 mph
9
posted on
02/08/2005 10:49:50 PM PST
by
Crazieman
(Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
To: Paul_Denton
But 1.5 millon miles per hour is still 416 miles per second.
10
posted on
02/08/2005 10:50:23 PM PST
by
Paul_Denton
(The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN!)
To: anymouse
I wouldn't want to be near this thing if it came back. It may go into some orbit!
11
posted on
02/08/2005 10:50:45 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: Caged in Canuckistan
There's no point in doomsday type blackhole scenarios, considering you and your greatX2,500 grandchildren wouldn't live long enough.
12
posted on
02/08/2005 10:51:05 PM PST
by
Crazieman
(Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
To: BikerTrash
Oops! Well, math was never my strong point. (Hm, how could you tell ...? LOL!) Thanks for the corrections, all.
But that's still darned fast.
13
posted on
02/08/2005 10:52:15 PM PST
by
Hetty_Fauxvert
(http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
As said before, it's 186,000 miles per second - that translates to 669,600,000mph. That star is only moving at 0.224% of the speed of light.
To: anymouse
While the companion star was captured by the black hole, the outcast continued on its whirling path around its edge.
My first thought was that it would be rather sad were there any life in this star system, or if it were to develop in the future, but wouldn't being so close to a black hole devouring a star pretty much kill anything in the system?
15
posted on
02/08/2005 10:55:01 PM PST
by
swilhelm73
(Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
To: swilhelm73
Its hard to say how extreme gravitation and time lensing would affect a biological system.
However - the star was not swallowed up, so its unlikely it would "kill anything in the system" - however passing so close to it would certainly distort and alter orbits.
Mass, proximity, angle, speed, mass of orbiting bodies, speeds, equatorial planes of orbit, etc etc. If we had EVERY factor (unlikely) we could simply plug in the numbers and get a result.
16
posted on
02/08/2005 10:59:20 PM PST
by
Crazieman
(Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
To: spodefly
>That would be 186,000 miles per second, not hour, for the
>speed of light.
For those of you who like myself be ignorant, that's 670,615,200 miles per hour, well faster than the piddling 1.5 million miles per hour this star is going.
17
posted on
02/08/2005 10:59:32 PM PST
by
ROTB
To: ElectionTracker; Hetty_Fauxvert
18
posted on
02/08/2005 11:00:06 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: ROTB
Actually, to be ultra accurate, 670,614,120
=]
19
posted on
02/08/2005 11:01:34 PM PST
by
Crazieman
(Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
To: Crazieman
Well, one of the stars in a binary system *was* swallowed, at least by my reading of the article.
Even if potential planets were close enough to the remaining star to stay in its orbit, and not have their orbits radically altered - I was more interested/worried in the resulting radiation from the swallowed star's demise.
20
posted on
02/08/2005 11:05:36 PM PST
by
swilhelm73
(Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson