[Archie Bunker on steroids]

I'm no Mc NAbb fan, but over rated he is not. The guy is easily in the top three QBs in the league. Ask any fantasy league player.

[Gforce11]

I'm no Mc NAbb fan, but over rated he is not. The guy is easily in the top three QBs in the league. Ask any fantasy league player.

I disagree but to each his own I guess. Until he and Manning can show me they can win the big ones, to win when it counts, I will go with the Bradys and the Montana's of the world.

[Echo Talon]

I'm no Mc NAbb fan, but over rated he is not. The guy is easily in the top three QBs in the league. Ask any fantasy league player.

Top 3? No way...

[SAJ]

The key word in your post being, of course, ''fantasy''.

Owens, love him or hate him, played brilliantly...the more so because he was clearly not 100%. Westbrook is a marvelous football player. Eagles' defense is very solid, but -- for various reasons including getting absolutely fooled a few times -- didn't put much pressure on Brady. And, the Eagles erred badly in not blanketing Branch, who thoroughly deserved the MVP award IMNNHO.

Net bottom line: today's Pats are easily the most complete team in the league, and Belichek couldn't care less about beating the spread. 3 Super Bowl wins, each time by 3 points?

Recalls a fellow named Al Davis to some extent: ''Just win, baby.''

[cspackler]

I'm no McNAbb fan, but over rated he is not. The guy is easily in the top three QBs in the league. Ask any fantasy league player.

Stats don't necessarily make a great QB. Aikman was never a good fantasy league QB, but would you honestly rather have McNabb or Aikman in your huddle? (During their primes, obviously)