Yes, I don't buy evolutionist's claim that "statistical improbability" is not a valid argument.
By the way, evolutionists argue from incredulity all the time when they say, "It must have been from natural causes, because a designer is unbelievable"
Sure it's a valid argument. Now show us your math, which accurately models biological processes. We'll wait.
What's that? You say you *don't* have any actual statistical calculations based on valid models, nor do you know how such a calculation would be performed, you just don't "feel" like such a thing would be likely enough to actually happen?
(Feel free to prove me wrong... But until then, I call BS...)
By the way, evolutionists argue from incredulity all the time when they say, "It must have been from natural causes, because a designer is unbelievable"
I call BS *again* on you. Provide a cite to *any* evolutionist who has actually argued such an idiotic point in that way -- or retract your bogus accusation.
I'm getting *really* tired of the unsupported accusations from you folks. Put up or shut up.