[Ichneumon]

Yes, I don't buy evolutionist's claim that "statistical improbability" is not a valid argument.

Sure it's a valid argument. Now show us your math, which accurately models biological processes. We'll wait.

What's that? You say you *don't* have any actual statistical calculations based on valid models, nor do you know how such a calculation would be performed, you just don't "feel" like such a thing would be likely enough to actually happen?

(Feel free to prove me wrong... But until then, I call BS...)

By the way, evolutionists argue from incredulity all the time when they say, "It must have been from natural causes, because a designer is unbelievable"

I call BS *again* on you. Provide a cite to *any* evolutionist who has actually argued such an idiotic point in that way -- or retract your bogus accusation.

I'm getting *really* tired of the unsupported accusations from you folks. Put up or shut up.

[PatrickHenry]

I'm getting *really* tired of the unsupported accusations from you folks. Put up or shut up.

I predict they will do neither. It's creationism, y'know.

[SubSailor]

Why do you feel so compelled to prove that you are right? If you know for a fact that you are right, why must you so adamantly insist that you are right? Why can you not be content with knowing? Why must you be so evangelistic in your arguments? Why is it so important to you? Do you not realize how immature it is to belittle and antagonize people?

[ol painless]

'Provide a cite to *any* evolutionist who has actually argued such an idiotic point in that way '

Dr. George Wald (Zoologist): "Most modern biologist, having reviewed with satisfaction the downfall of the spontaneous generation hypothesis, yet unwilling to accept the alternative belief in special creation, are left with nothing...To make an organism demands the right substances in the right proportions and in the right arrangement. We do not think that anything more is needed-but that is problem enough. One has only to contemplate the magnitude of this task to concede that the spontaneous generation of a living organism is impossible. Yet here we are-as a result, I believe, of spontaneous generation"(Scientific American, 1958, Sept., pp. 45-53.).