Skip to comments.
Fact is, this theory is under attack (Evolution Revolution Alert)
Baltimoresun.com ^
| 5 Feb 2005
| Arthur Hirsch
Posted on 02/05/2005 11:37:51 AM PST by gobucks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 601-617 next last
To: jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
Are you suggesting that having a law proscribing murder is unConstitutional?No, didn't your mother teach you murder is wrong? Are you saying you have to be religious to think murder is wrong? Give me a break.
We can pass more laws against murder, that is great. You just can't base it on religion, establishing your religion and violating the constitution.
462
posted on
02/05/2005 10:35:22 PM PST
by
Step_Into_the_Void
(Fiscal conservative - don't take my money - you didn't work for it - I did.)
To: FreeReign
To: _Jim
Thank you for sharing your frustrations!
The havoc you may wreak, in this 'populist' approach of disregarding and throwing aside determined, rigorous research and study is, IMNSHO, immeasurable.
And you say all of this without even looking at my comments and sources ...
To: Northeast
Trying to be more vaguely sarcastic then I, huh?
;)
To: Step_Into_the_Void
You don't know what you are talking about. Lawmakers vote on laws based on their moral upbringing, religious or otherwise.
There is only one test that the 1A establishment clause has to pass these days and that is the stupid Lemon Test. You can google it so you know what you are talking about next time you post here at FR.
To: FreeReign
Not at all =).
One extreme example deserves another!
Regards!
To: _Jim
Let me also add that you 'butt out' in the future any time I am addressing another poster.And let me add that as long as this is a public forum I'll 'butt in' any time I please.
Meanwhile you are free to desist from getting a grip.
To: jwalsh07
...the stupid Lemon Test.What would you propose as the alternative? I'm just curious.
469
posted on
02/05/2005 10:42:03 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Stultis
Uh, can you give an example, even a single one, of a fraud (or even an error) that was embraced "rabidly" and "enthusiastically" by the community of evolutionists/scientists?How long did it take Piltdown to be denounced? How many Lamarckian drawings are still being touted as evidence for evolution? Too long and too many, as far as pure science goes.
Have you ever checked into how the Piltdown evidence was received and published by the "scientific" community?
To: AntiGuv
What would you propose as the alternative? I'm just curious.The 1A.
To: jwalsh07
You are going to teach me about the Lemon test. (heh, heh, I may have heard of it [/sarcasm]
Oh, the stupid lemon test. Those Supreme Court justices and Harvard lawyers are just not as smart as you.
472
posted on
02/05/2005 10:47:28 PM PST
by
Step_Into_the_Void
(Fiscal conservative - don't take my money - you didn't work for it - I did.)
To: Step_Into_the_Void
A majority of the Supreme Court Justices have denounced in one opinion or another dingbat.
So tell us Oliver Wendell, what "religious" laws would you like repealed. No God in the pledge? The DOI ruled unConstitutional for the Creator and rights thingy? Crosses removed from the graves of our dead vets?
To: Fester Chugabrew
As far as I have been able to observe there has not been any kind of organization completely apart from intelligence and/or design. How about a storm system, or a tornado. Are the air molecules intelligent? As a simpler, if more trivial, example, the sand grains on a beach are organized. The grains are larger to smaller in size as one moves up the beach. Is the surf "intelligent"? Does it "know" to loose energy, and therefore deposit smaller grains, as it moves up the beach?
474
posted on
02/05/2005 10:50:07 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: Step_Into_the_Void
No, didn't your mother teach you murder is wrong? Are you saying you have to be religious to think murder is wrong? Give me a break. Do you have to be religious to think abortion is wrong?
To: Step_Into_the_Void
Oh, the stupid lemon test. Those Supreme Court justices and Harvard lawyers are just not as smart as you.Doesn't matter, I'm not arguing with them. I'm arguing with you so like the two guys and the bear I just have to be smarter than you and that doesn't appear to be any big reach on the bell curve.
To: FreeReign
Do you have to be religious to think abortion is wrong?Who cares?
477
posted on
02/05/2005 10:52:46 PM PST
by
Step_Into_the_Void
(Fiscal conservative - don't take my money - you didn't work for it - I did.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
And let me add that as long as this is a public forum I'll 'butt in' any time I please.
Unacceptable.
Reconsider.
478
posted on
02/05/2005 10:54:25 PM PST
by
_Jim
(<--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
To: Step_Into_the_Void
Do you have to be religious to think abortion is wrong? Who cares?
You avoid the question. What are you afraid of? I'll ask it again:
Do you have to be religious to think abortion is wrong?
To: AntiGuv
Oops Anti, I mistakenly freep mailed ya response I meant to post here. Sorry.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 601-617 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson