Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baby Dies After Allegedly Being Infected With Herpes During Circumcision
NY1 ^ | 2/2/05

Posted on 02/02/2005 8:14:33 PM PST by finnman69

City health officials are trying to stop a Rockland County rabbi from performing circumcisions, after a baby boy died from herpes he allegedly contracted from the rabbi during a circumcision.

The city Department of Health said Wednesday it is seeking a permanent injunction against Rabbi Yitzhok Fischer. The DOH says Fischer uses an ancient religious custom of using his mouth to suck the infant's blood after cutting the foreskin.

According to court papers filed in Manhattan, a 3-week-old boy died from herpes 10 days after he and his twin brother were circumcised by Fischer in October. The boy’s twin was also infected with the virus.

In addition, a Staten Island boy was also reportedly infected with herpes after a circumcision performed by Fischer in 2003.

DOH officials say Fischer did not comply with an order given in November to stop performing circumcisions and to have his blood tested.

“Infants, particularly under the age of six months, are highly susceptible to infections. They do not have a functioning immune system," said Health Commissioner Dr. Thomas Frieden.

Fischer's attorney says his client is cooperating with the city in an effort to determine what he says it “the true source” of the infection.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; US: New York
KEYWORDS: circumcision; health; herpes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: TFMcGuire

I'm talking about parents like ourselves that used midwives rather than doctors. They are less likely to circumcise anyway and explore other options if they do.


61 posted on 02/04/2005 8:21:01 AM PST by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire
There is evidence that this procedure has health benefits both for the man and his wife as well.

More than 30 years ago in 1971 the American Academy of Pediatrics said, "There are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period."

In 2005 every professional medical organization that has an official policy on circumcision says there is no medical indication for infant circumcision.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia says:

"Infant male circumcision was once considered a preventive health measure and was therefore adopted extensively in Western countries. Current understanding of the benefits, risks and potential harm of this procedure, however, no longer supports this practice for prophylactic health benefit. Routine infant male circumcision performed on a healthy infant is now considered a non-therapeutic and medically unnecessary intervention." -- Infant Male Circumcision (Jun 2004)

62 posted on 02/11/2005 1:14:07 AM PST by intacto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

Questioning Circumcision: A Jewish Perspective
by Ronald Goldman, PhD

My sister and I bought this book last summer before my niece was born (we didn't know what she was carrying at the time.) Gives great background on the ancient tradition and also talks about why some people still partake in the ritual.

I guess the first thing parents that are uneducated need to know is that your son is still Jewish whether circumcised or not-at least in the Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist movements...

Hope this helps.


63 posted on 02/15/2005 3:14:53 PM PST by ProudToBeV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ProudToBeV

thanks!


64 posted on 02/15/2005 3:16:21 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: It's me
Errr, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
66 posted on 02/15/2005 3:21:49 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire
Humor Columnist Dave Barry has an article about the organization RECAP--who wants either to ban circumcision, or how to undo the effects of one.

They sound like loons.

Cheers!

67 posted on 02/15/2005 3:23:23 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Swede Girl
Ummm, yeah.

Is this because (by your screen name) you are from "Old Europe" ? /grin

68 posted on 02/15/2005 3:24:08 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
HERPES.?.
What'd they do.. BITE the damned foreskin off .?.
69 posted on 02/15/2005 3:25:58 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Thanks for the information--I was wondering if the procedure was on the level.

Sure am glad I restrained from posting the corny jokes swimming around in my head; I truly would be hanging my head in shame right now.

I agree with your sentiments regarding the Rabbi.


70 posted on 02/15/2005 3:26:19 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bones75

Never in my life have I heard of a Rabbi sucking the blood like this. OMG.


71 posted on 02/15/2005 3:27:19 PM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

That is just sickening. With all due respect to my Jewish friends, I would never let a man suck the blood (or anything for that matter) off my child's penis regardless of its religious roots and symbolism. That is just downright nasty. Right before dinner too... ughh ...thanks. :(


72 posted on 02/15/2005 3:30:00 PM PST by rampage8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
There is far less risk of innumerous genital diseases and hygenic issues among those circumsized

Nonsense!
Using that logic, why not amputate a girl's labia?
...
73 posted on 02/15/2005 3:44:59 PM PST by mugs99 (Restore the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I have no idea what you are trying to say.

That is, if you are trying to say anything at all.


74 posted on 02/15/2005 4:47:19 PM PST by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
Nonsense! Using that logic, why not amputate a girl's labia?

Because removing the labia would have the opposite effect...increased baterial, yeast and viral infections. The glans penis is an extetrnal organ, so the foreskin is nothing but a trap for dirt and bacteria and does nothign to protect the penis opening from harmful substances, unlike the internal vaginal canal, which is indeed protected.

75 posted on 02/15/2005 5:43:29 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Dirt? My god man, you're not supposed to use your tool for digging!


76 posted on 02/15/2005 9:24:36 PM PST by mugs99 (Restore the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
Dirt? My god man, you're not supposed to use your tool for digging!

ROTFLMAO

77 posted on 02/15/2005 9:47:09 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson