Skip to comments.
72% Iraqi Turnout Stuns U.S. Press
NewsMax.com ^
| 1/30/05
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 01/30/2005 7:57:33 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-232 next last
1
posted on
01/30/2005 7:57:33 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
2
posted on
01/30/2005 7:58:30 AM PST
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: kattracks
The dem talking head talking point.......unquantifiable......used by jennings and by williams.
Even heard a comment that we can't comment on the turnout numbers because after all we all know about exit poll numbers.
The left is bitterly disappointed at this UNQUALIFIED SUCCESS.
3
posted on
01/30/2005 7:59:21 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(America's glory is not dominion, but liberty.)
To: kattracks
another super turnout - just like Ukraine.
why do some Leftists find it so hard to understand that most people are like most people.
Nobody wants bloodsucking despots controlling their lives!
To: kattracks
What??! The MSM is WRONG again?! I'm shocked!!
5
posted on
01/30/2005 8:00:51 AM PST
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: Fenris6
The bad news is that the ballots were discovered in King County and were cast for Dimwit Gregoire to be Governor of Washington. ;-)
6
posted on
01/30/2005 8:01:29 AM PST
by
peyton randolph
(CAIR supports TROP terrorists)
To: kattracks
WAY TO GO IRAQIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Course the US has 110% turnout in some democrat districts.
But in my precinct we usually run about 10-20% turnout. And no one is even shooting at them. Sad isn't it?
7
posted on
01/30/2005 8:01:36 AM PST
by
The Bat Lady
(Lighting the fires of Liberty, one heart at a time!)
To: kattracks
Is the press aware that 70% is higher than the percentage of registered voters who participated in the 2004 United States Presidential election?
8
posted on
01/30/2005 8:01:45 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: kattracks
Didn't surprise me at all. I figured it to be even higher.
9
posted on
01/30/2005 8:02:45 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(How do you say Berkeley California in Aramaic?)
To: blackminorcapullets
Nobody wants bloodsucking despots controlling their lives! Sounds like a divorce court issue.
10
posted on
01/30/2005 8:03:00 AM PST
by
peyton randolph
(CAIR supports TROP terrorists)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
I too am stunned. I was feeling rather good about electtions but then Friday heard Fox war reporter Steve Harrigan. I consider him very reliable. His opinion was that Sunday would be a "bloodbath". He said elections would be a complete failure and many people would die.
Oh well, I shouldn't be surprised that another reporter turns out to be wrong.
12
posted on
01/30/2005 8:03:06 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(DU: ''Reality sucks. That's the problem. We want another reality.'')
To: kattracks
72 percent?
It sure is nice that the number 72 will now mean something in the Arab world other than...you know...
To: kattracks
They are just pissed because Bush will come out as the clear victor in this along with the fact that the truth has come to light...Iraqi people want their freedom and independence. Also, the U.S. needs to adopt the ink policy if you ask me although methinks that would supress the voting numbers even further because Dem's won't be able to use fraud like they love doing in places like PA,Wisc,and OH.
To: kattracks
I remember the Sunday that Time and Newsweek covers both said
Quagmire while on TV, Special Forces and Afghan Cavalry were driving the Taliban before them.
Once again, the press and the DemonRat Party have been caught hoping for and expecting disaster.
Once again, they lose.
So9
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Rather and Jennings are in Iraq to report on the low turnout. Are they Pissed?
To: kattracks
Good for the Iraqi citizens, not letting the terrorists scare them away from freedom. They should be proud of themselves.
17
posted on
01/30/2005 8:04:08 AM PST
by
discostu
(quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
To: kattracks
many of whom had predicted that terrorists would succeed in sabotaging the U.S.- backed referendum. lets clarify; many of whom had hoped that terrorists would succeed in sabotaging the U.S.- backed referendum.
18
posted on
01/30/2005 8:04:23 AM PST
by
bad company
(if guns cause crime, then keyboards cause spelling mistakes)
To: kattracks
how can that be?
u.s. media leftists "surprised"?
(/s)
19
posted on
01/30/2005 8:04:31 AM PST
by
ken21
(baba boxer + ted kennedy = nuf 2 make u wanna puke)
To: kattracks
20
posted on
01/30/2005 8:04:47 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-232 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson