Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doctor Stochastic
People often make the mistake of using "crossstream" (inferences from a population of sequencess of a given length, sometimes called "weak") computations to model "downstream" (inferences along a given sequence, sometimes called "strong") computations.

I knew I was getting in over my head.

1,578 posted on 02/02/2005 12:57:01 PM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1554 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
People often make the mistake of using "crossstream" (inferences from a population of sequencess of a given length, sometimes called "weak") computations to model "downstream" (inferences along a given sequence, sometimes called "strong") computations.

Couple of off-the-wall observations here.

1) Why does this bring the word "ergodic" to mind?
(look it up on www.m-w.com...)

2) This also seems like the way I have been told some
drug companies and others investigate the effects
of chemical additives on organisms--overdosing
on a given chemical all at once to simulate
cumulative, long-term exposure.

Cheers!

1,583 posted on 02/02/2005 1:02:35 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1578 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson