Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
People often make the mistake of using "crossstream" (inferences from a population of sequencess of a given length, sometimes called "weak") computations to model "downstream" (inferences along a given sequence, sometimes called "strong") computations.

Couple of off-the-wall observations here.

1) Why does this bring the word "ergodic" to mind?
(look it up on www.m-w.com...)

2) This also seems like the way I have been told some
drug companies and others investigate the effects
of chemical additives on organisms--overdosing
on a given chemical all at once to simulate
cumulative, long-term exposure.

Cheers!

1,583 posted on 02/02/2005 1:02:35 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1578 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

In an ergodic system, the crossstream (note the artificially induced sss) and downstream properties are the same. Coin tossing games are not that way. The properties of 10 games of matching pennies with 10 tosses are not the same as that of a single game of 100 tosses. (Trivially, one cannot be behind 11 points in a 10 toss game.)


1,585 posted on 02/02/2005 1:06:33 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1583 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson