[freedumb2003]

In 1995 Stewart has a 135 QB rating. His career rating was 70.

Vicks are pretty close -- 76.1 and his highest has been an 81.

I know some people don't like ratings, but it can be used to group QBs -- Stewart and Vick are analagous but Kordell at his best was better than Vick at his best.

[discostu]

No Kordell at his best doesn't even rate with Vick at his best. At his best Vick is going to be responsible for over 300 yards in a game, at his best Kordell managed to be responsible for no turn overs. SOrry but Stewart should never have been a starting QB in the NFL for any team at any time, I can understand why Vick is a starting QB.

[KJacob]

In 1995 Stewart has a 135 QB rating.

I assume you are talking about one game. Stewart was never close to 100 for a season.

[JohnnyZ]

Michael Vick is the difference between the Falcons being 11-5 and 5-11.

That says he a pretty damn good QB.