I have no idea what that post even means. You're the one that keeps asking the same questions over and over, you're the one that wants people to repeat themselves. Oh and YOU'RE the one that wound up agreeing with me about the Creeds, you said they were the whole thing I said they were the overview then finally you said they were the table of contents which is another phrase for... OVERVIEW.
Now you're delusional. I knew it might be a problem to compare these with a TOC, even though this is the presentation in various ways from Aquinas to well-beloved catechisms. The four principal Creeds of The Church are, in fact, a dogmatic, definitive, complete statement of the Faith. It was rather you who wound up blaspheming against God, The Holy Spirit, in order to insist that the Creeds were essentially worthless and the product of a doomed effort to succinctly state the principal tenets of the Faith. If God had only been as smart as you, in other words. I was I who repeatedly, over and over again, stated that volumes had been written, lives lived over the centuries, based on a confession of that Faith. And there was and is even more to it all than all of that. And yet none of these would have denied the importance of the Creeds, as you have done.