Posted on 01/13/2005 8:33:37 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
ATLANTA (AP) -- Federal judge rules the evolution disclaimer stickers placed inside Cobb County science textbooks are unconsitutional.
Sounds like you're ready to lock and load.
Been trying to get it, but reports PDF damaged.
You're absolutely correct. The 14th Amendment gives the Federal government the constitutional basis to intervene in state affairs. That amendment has to be repealed before any real progress is to be made in rolling back the Federal leviathan.
Indeed. Or, at the very least, reinterpreted in such a way as to be less conducive to federal intervention in every single aspect of state actions.
Uh... that's café au lait. It means "coffee with milk".
If you are able to download and read it, will you be kind enough to start a new thread with the decision text, by converting the pdf to text?
I've been around long enough to remember the other side of this when the fight was to get evolution printed in the schoolbooks in the first place. There were disclaimer requirements then too.
One thing about pendulums, they inevitably swing in the other direction until someone figures out a way to freeze them.
I think the sticker should stay but should address both sides of the coin.
"Creationism is a religious belief with no basis in empirical science, and evolution is a scientific theory, not a fact."
For ALL citizens are citizens of a state not citizens of America. America has NO citizens, only States do.. The Federal government is a mental construct, the states are tangible real entities.. Its unconstitutional for the federal government to have citizens.. American citizens is also a mental construct.. for only states have citizens..
For the federal government to have citizens is an attack on the concept of a republic.. making it a democracy.. which of course is MOB RULE.. ruled by mobsters all mobbed up.. with territorys.. NOT SOVERIGN STATES..
Supre*e Court expected to uphold!
The John Jay, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison fought Thomas Jefferson over that very concept a long time ago. The Federalists won. The papers (both sides of the argument) make for an awesome, mind opening read.
Do they have a section on creationism in the textbook?
But the deal works like this: the judicial activists merely need to issue decisions ruling that a certain act has violated the Constitution because it "endorsed" religion. Those rulings are then used to pave the way for other rulings. They are building a wall, and they don't need to use reality to slap the blocks together.
This will soon lead to rulings that establish guilt by reason of "intent to endorse", which will then then to prosecution for thought crimes.
Seems to me it's been done before.
Strict adherance to his logic would call for the removal of all trademarks and copyright designations as they would be "endorsements."
This textbook is rated "E?"
Thanks for the ping! IMHO, this is another form of judicial activism and needs to be prosecuted all the way to the Supremes.
Would that be First or Second Kings?
Uh... that's café au lait. It means "coffee with milk".
Maybe he was having coffee with a matador...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.