Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call Us Crazy, but We See a Buddy Movie Here (Moore/Gibson)
NY Times ^ | 1/11/05 | Joyce Walder

Posted on 01/11/2005 10:24:20 AM PST by 1LongTimeLurker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
"I feel a strange kinship with Michael," Mr. Gibson said. "They're trying to pit us against each other in the press, but it's a hologram. They really have got nothing to do with one another. It's just some kind of device, some left-right. He makes some salient points. There was some very expert, elliptical editing going on. However, what the hell are we doing in Iraq? No one can explain to me in a reasonable manner that I can accept why we're there, why we went there, and why we're still there."

What a nice way to thank all those Conservatives who supported your film Mel.

1 posted on 01/11/2005 10:24:21 AM PST by 1LongTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

This has already been discussed on two threads. Also, not every conservative is for the war in Iraq.


2 posted on 01/11/2005 10:28:29 AM PST by Pyro7480 ("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

This "kinship" was also costly to conservative principles.

3 posted on 01/11/2005 10:31:58 AM PST by Stew Padasso ("That boy is nuttier than a squirrel turd.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

'This has already been discussed on two threads. Also, not every conservative is for the war in Iraq".


Exactly. There are many types of "conservative"- fiscal, foreign policy, social etc. What does supporting Iraq have to do with The Passion of the Christ?


4 posted on 01/11/2005 10:33:12 AM PST by LongsforReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

"However, what the hell are we doing in Iraq? No one can explain to me in a reasonable manner that I can accept why we're there, why we went there, and why we're still there."

Buh-bye, Mel. You and your movie crap are off my watch list.


5 posted on 01/11/2005 10:33:24 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

"No one can explain to me in a reasonable manner that I can accept why we're there, why we went there, and why we're still there."

You must not be willing to understand then, Mel. Might as well move on to things you can accept, like rising from the dead.


6 posted on 01/11/2005 10:34:13 AM PST by Max Combined
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
Buh-bye, Mel. You and your movie crap are off my watch list.

Please. I dont agree with Mel's opinion about the war but he is far from being the enemy here. He has an opinion, he voiced it because he was asked. I would prefer him to not give Moore the ammunition but if I had to have everyone agree with me, I would be a lonely person.

7 posted on 01/11/2005 10:38:27 AM PST by smith288 (I have posted over 10,000 times. The more I post, the more intelligent you become!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

It was always about the bottom line and if you had any doubt you must have realized when he was selling souvenir nails that something was amiss.


8 posted on 01/11/2005 10:39:50 AM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan

"What does supporting Iraq have to do with The Passion of the Christ?"

What bothers some people, and rightly so IMO, is not Gibson's opposition to the Iraq war, per se, but his cozying up to Moore, a repugnant, vitriolic creep who has created a Nazi-like piece of agitprop. There are people on the left who oppose the war and yet identify Moore for what he is...a disreputable propagandist. Also, Gibson said he "liked" Moore's movie; this goes way beyond merely being civil, or diplomatic. What does this have to do with The Passion?.....nothing, but it certainly does not flatter Gibson, in my view.


9 posted on 01/11/2005 10:44:35 AM PST by macamadamia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smith288

By making such an inane comment, he's shown me that he "doesn't get it", which puts him squarely in the enemy's camp. There is other entertainment out there, exclusive of Gibson. He's off my list.


10 posted on 01/11/2005 10:57:34 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

Ugh - goatees. When I see a girlie man with a goatee, it makes me want to get out the razor and take the whole chin off.


11 posted on 01/11/2005 11:32:11 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288

If Mel's words are used JUST ONCE to bolster the morale of the enemy over there and one more soldier gets killed because of it, I would hold him responsible. We are at war...we must use some better judgement on the words we use while getting the same message across. Anybody who ever thought tha Gibson was about anything but money needs to come back to Planet Earth (Sure did like "Signs" though)


12 posted on 01/11/2005 11:46:39 AM PST by Lekker 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: macamadamia
There are people on the left who oppose the war and yet identify Moore for what he is...a disreputable propagandist.

As opposed to a reputable propagandist?

Bush's HHS created and distributed bogus news reports for broadcast in order to sway public opinion in favor of his Medicare legislation.

Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services --Video News Releases, B-302710, May 19, 2004:

Conclusion
Although the VNR materials were labeled so that the television news stations could identify CMS as the source of the materials, part of the VNR materials--the story packages and lead-in anchor scripts--were targeted not only to the television news stations but also to the television viewing audience. Neither the story packages nor scripts identified HHS or CMS as the source to the targeted television audience, and the content of the news reports was attributed to individuals purporting to be reporters, but actually (were actors) hired by an HHS subcontractor. For these reasons, the use of appropriated funds for production and distribution of the story packages and suggested scripts violated the publicity or propaganda prohibition of the Consolidated Appropriation Resolution of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-7, Div. J, Tit. VI, § 626, 117 Stat. 11, 470 (2003). Moreover, because CMS had no appropriation available to produce and distribute materials in violation of the publicity or propaganda prohibition, CMS violated the Antideficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341. CMS must report the Antideficiency Act violation to the Congress and the President. 31 U.S.C. § 1351.

Anthony H. Gamboa
General Counsel

13 posted on 01/11/2005 11:51:40 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lekker 1
Anybody who ever thought tha Gibson was about anything but money needs to come back to Planet Earth

Bull. You know Mel's intentions as much as you know mine. Don't be so presumptuous. (and Signs was fantastic)

14 posted on 01/11/2005 12:03:29 PM PST by smith288 (I have posted over 10,000 times. The more I post, the more intelligent you become!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

"As opposed to a reputable propagandist?"


Well....yes. I won't accept the idea that propaganda is universally bad. Why can't one be a reputable propagandist; in my opinion, WWII propaganda against the Nazis and the Japanese was justified.


Also, I don't like your assumption that I've condoned the matter of Bush's dept. of Health and Human Services and that I am therefore somehow hypocritical. I never even brought Bush into the matter nor have I defended or criticized anything involving Bush. This is deflection and it does nothing to diminish Moore's trail of slime.


15 posted on 01/11/2005 12:33:09 PM PST by macamadamia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: macamadamia
Well....yes. I won't accept the idea that propaganda is universally bad. Why can't one be a reputable propagandist; in my opinion, WWII propaganda against the Nazis and the Japanese was justified.

True. But, I wasn't talking about WWII propaganda used against an enemy in a declared war. I was talking about a supposedly conservative President who foists propaganda off on an unsuspecting public in order to garner favor for legislation that will greatly enlarge the welfare state. There is a difference, no?

Also, I don't like your assumption that I've condoned the matter of Bush's dept. of Health and Human Services and that I am therefore somehow hypocritical. I never even brought Bush into the matter nor have I defended or criticized anything involving Bush. This is deflection and it does nothing to diminish Moore's trail of slime.

I assumed nothing of the sort. I only sought to point out that the left does not hold a monopoly on the use of propaganda and brought up Bush's HHS Medicare propaganda as an example of this point.

I have no doubt that until I brought this to your attention, you, like most FReepers, were unaware that Bush did this just as you were probably unaware that Bush has signed a Totalization Agreement with Mexico that will allow millions of former and current Mexican illegal aliens to apply for and receive US Social Security benefits for themselves, their wives and their children even if their wives and children have never stepped foot into the US.

16 posted on 01/11/2005 1:07:17 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

Mel's a Paleocon. 'Nuff said.


17 posted on 01/11/2005 1:08:23 PM PST by Clemenza (President: Liger Breeders of the Pacific Northwest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Im sure Mel voted for Bush so let's not stop likeing him for this now im going to watch The Road Warrior.


18 posted on 01/11/2005 1:50:39 PM PST by Johnny Allright ((Republicans are a Heavy Metal Rock Group Democrats are a Boy Band))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker

Mel Gibson is absolutely right about Iraq.


19 posted on 01/12/2005 5:11:10 AM PST by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1LongTimeLurker
What a nice way to thank all those Conservatives who supported your film Mel.

As an antiwar, anti-Bush voter who was deeply moved by the The Passion Of Christ, I say, "Way to go, Mel!"

20 posted on 01/12/2005 7:53:25 PM PST by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson