[Darkwolf377]

I'd agree with you, except those decisions were in the context of an ongoing war. Nuking Mecca would be payback for a repeat of 9-11. And how did we respond to 9-11? By taking down two countries.

How to respond to a 9-11 Part II? Taking out Mecca, despite your legitimate point, would be in keeping with Bush's response to the first one.

[endthematrix]

The US will not nuke Mecca. Now Iran's and N Korea's nuclear program is on the table for sure.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Our threats should remain vague and gloomy. Let them wonder. All Bush needs to do now is speak kindness and let actions be the threats. He's time tested. Speak softly, and carry a big stick.

[meatloaf]

The other point is; if Allah does favor Muslims to the degree that they believe their religon to be supreme, nuking Mecca, would obviously discredit Mohammed's religion. Allah wouldn't have allowed it otherwise.

Of course he wouldn't have alowed two Islamic countries to fall to, so-called, infidels either. Religion, the opiate of the masses. Still an addiction after millennia.