Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Nearly half of all Americans support restricting rights of Muslim-Americans
WLBT ^ | December 17, 2004 | AP

Posted on 12/17/2004 3:57:13 PM PST by yonif

ITHACA, N.Y. A nationwide poll finds nearly half of all Americans believe the U-S government should restrict the civil liberties of Muslim Americans.

The survey -- conducted this fall by Cornell University -- found that 44 percent favored at least some restrictions, while 48 percent said civil liberties shouldn't be restricted in any way.

Twenty-seven percent of the 715 respondents supported requiring all Muslim-Americans to register where they lived -- and 29 percent thought agents should infiltrate Muslim civic and volunteer groups.

The poll also found Republicans and people who described themselves as highly religious were more likely to support curtailing Muslims' civil liberties than Democrats or people who are less religious.

The executive director of the Muslim American Society says the news is disturbing, but not surprising.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: america; islam; muslimamericans; muslims; religionofpeace; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-377 next last
To: Slump Tester

until this year, most arab americans (not quite the same as muslim americans, but mostly overlap) voted republican


341 posted on 12/18/2004 9:33:18 AM PST by BackInBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BackInBlack
"until this year, most arab americans (not quite the same as muslim americans, but mostly overlap) voted republican"

A reasonable sacrifice for us Republicans to make (hopefully offset by picking up some Jewish votes).

But this point is interesting. We have liberated Iraq and the Afghans and we are actively seeking out Muslim terrorize not just Americans, but law-abiding Muslims, in this country. But what do the rank and file Muslims do? They vote for the party that supports the terrorists, here and abroad. That makes a lot of wonder just who's side they're really on.
342 posted on 12/18/2004 9:41:44 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: anglian
"Individual Islamists may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers."

Appearances sure can be decieving... especially when one is allowed to lie and practice taqiyah and deception to promote the Islamic cause.

I'm reminded this question and reply from mainstream Islamic site Ask the Imam

Q: To become a citizen of US one has to take an oath of allegiance. is it ok to take the oath.

A: As Muslims, we are duty bound to follow our lives strictly according to Shari’ah. Whatever Shari’ah allows us to do, we will abide by that and whatever Shari’ah has restricted us from, we will refrain from it. Hence, we are not allowed to obey anybody if it is resulting in the disobedience of the Creator, Allah. Nabi (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) said, ‘There is no obedience for the creation by disobeying the Creator.’ (Mirqaat vol.7 pg.217; Imdadiyyah).

Hence, keeping this in mind if one is forced to sign the above in order to become a citizen or the only way of attaining citizenship is by acknowledging the above, then one may sign it with the intention that Shari’ah and Deen will always be his yardstick and that he will never sacrifice any of the teachings of Deen.

and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best

Mufti Ebrahim Desai

As for CAIR, there's more by Daniel Pipes here.
343 posted on 12/18/2004 9:45:46 AM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I have thought for some time we should only allow Muslims here from countries that have Christian Churches and freedom of religion in the native country.

We fought long and hard in this country to have religious freedom so they should be required to stay in their own countries and fix that problem, and THEN come here.

Also no Muslims or Mosques for Muslims from Muslim countries that persecute and do not allow other religions.

That would cut down on the population of Muslims and mosques that are storehouses for weapons in this country.

Turnabout is fair play. Tolerance should go both ways.

344 posted on 12/18/2004 9:47:46 AM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lutonian
Threads like these worry me

Then trot your sorry a$$ back to the DU and stop worrying. You won't be missed.
345 posted on 12/18/2004 10:17:59 AM PST by broadsword (When Islam creeps into a human society, oppression, misogyny and terror come hard on its heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: BobL
But what do the rank and file Muslims do? They vote for the party that supports the terrorists, here and abroad. That makes a lot of wonder just who's side they're really on.

They are on the side of Islam, not on the side of "the Great Satan".
346 posted on 12/18/2004 10:22:30 AM PST by broadsword (When Islam creeps into a human society, oppression, misogyny and terror come hard on its heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

Comment #347 Removed by Moderator

To: jan in Colorado

Thank You, again Jan. NSNR


348 posted on 12/18/2004 10:34:07 AM PST by No Surrender No Retreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Drango
If the civil liberties of Muslim Americans can be restricted, then the civil liberties of Catholics, Jews, Mormons and 7th day Adventists can be restricted. No thanks.

Wrong. The ultimate goal of islam is to subvert the republic. We can, have and should restrict any groups with this ultimate goal.

349 posted on 12/18/2004 10:50:04 AM PST by houeto (I keep tabs of how many FReepers 'get it' and how many don't...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: houeto; Drango; jan in Colorado
We can, have and should restrict any groups with this ultimate goal.

I'm more worried about not being able to have my human sacrifices for Huitzilopochtli. ;o)

350 posted on 12/18/2004 11:21:31 AM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: yonif

Headline notwithstamding, I see nothing in the results favoring reducing rights. WE ALL were were required to register where we live during recent census, and NO group is immune to "infiltration" (it happens to Catholic groups all the time).


351 posted on 12/18/2004 11:27:11 AM PST by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BackInBlack
"until this year, most arab americans (not quite the same as muslim americans, but mostly overlap) voted republican"

_______________________________________

Any sources for that please?

352 posted on 12/18/2004 2:50:16 PM PST by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: broadsword
Undoubtedly most people would find the image of Christian Mongols a bit of a step off the planet. However, the Mongols did conquer Christian areas, and Mongols certainly got assimilated.

The "penetration" of Type B bloodtype into Eastern, Central and Western Europe is a tribute to their "advance". I don't see all that many Buddhists in that area these days, so something happened, eh?!

I hope you picked up on the article about a single "Y" chromosome being found in some 10% of all the males in that vast swath of territory conquered and held by the Mongols. It is being attributed to Ghengis Khan himself! Supposedly he is one of history's greatest fornicators!

You don't suppose he held the line at sleeping with Christian girls do you?

353 posted on 12/18/2004 3:16:40 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: weenie; broadsword
It's pretty clear to me now that "weenie" thinks I'm a Moslem.

I'm not.

On the other hand my pen-name is one I've had in use for the last 42 years. This particular hornswaggler who inched his way up to the Caliphate and the founding of a dynasty is about the closest thing to a Jeffersonian the world would see in the period 6000BC to 1774AD.

He advanced Arabian interests simply by refusing to let Islams' ridiculous demands bother him.

354 posted on 12/18/2004 3:21:31 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: broadsword
Again, this is the one where you claimed the Chinese never accepted the Mongols ~ let's get back to the issue of just exactly how Genghis Khan's Y chromosome ended up in 10% of the men in modern China.

Seems to me somebody did some accepting eh?!

355 posted on 12/18/2004 3:25:57 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
> Any sources for that please?

In the 2000 presidential election, as many as 80% of Muslim voters cast their ballots for George W. Bush. http://christianity.about.com/od/religionandthepresidency/a/muslimvote.htm

I'm not saying this is correct...but elements of Muslim society are very conservative and reject much of the liberal dogma. Palestine and Iraq have changed much of that dynamic.

356 posted on 12/18/2004 3:30:51 PM PST by Drango (Those who advocate robbing (taxing) Peter to pay Paul...will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I hear you...no prob.


357 posted on 12/18/2004 3:31:17 PM PST by weenie (Islam is as "dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: Drango
More than half the Moslems in the US are African-Americans and they are believed by most surveyors to vote the same way as other African-Americans.

Getting a picture of what non-AA Moslems in the US are doing in elections is very difficult since there are so few of them and they live in so many places.

358 posted on 12/18/2004 3:42:45 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

"until this year, most arab americans (not quite the same as muslim americans, but mostly overlap) voted republican"

You wanted a source on that. Turns out my memory was a little off. What I was remembering was that a majority of Arab Americans voted for George W. Bush in 2000. Looking back at that, turns out I was right: Bush beat Gore by 7.5 points among these voters. But their votes for Republican vs. Democratic members of Congress were virtually tied, as were their party affiliation numbers. In 1996, Clinton beat Dole handily among these voters, so it looks like my assumption was off. Here's a source:

http://www.aaiusa.org/PDF/AAvoters.pdf

Still, Kerry beat Bush by about 2:1 among Arab Americans this year, at least in swing states (thus presumably pretty close to representative of the nation): http://www.aaiusa.org/finalpoll2004.htm

So my basic point that this election brought a major Arab American shift to the Democrats remains valid.


359 posted on 12/18/2004 3:56:40 PM PST by BackInBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: broadsword; Lutonian

"Threads like these worry me"

"Then trot your sorry a$$ back to the DU and stop worrying. You won't be missed."


Me to?
Is someone who doesn't believe we are at war with Islam and is concerned about about anti-Muslim statements a DUer?

“We reject every act of hatred against people of Arab background or Muslim faith… America values and welcomes peaceful people of all faiths"


360 posted on 12/18/2004 4:00:10 PM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-377 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson