Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/16/2004 11:14:18 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Next...Scarface and Glengarry Glen Ross


2 posted on 12/16/2004 11:14:48 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

In my opinion, anyone that thinks Private Ryan's language or violence is "innaproriate" is a damn fool. Either watch a very realistic account of a critical point in American history (which is so damn rare in today's media), or don't. Certain things rise above the normal rules.


3 posted on 12/16/2004 11:17:13 AM PST by Shryke (My Beeb-o-meter goes all the way to eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

So it appears that the stations that chose not to run it were justified, as the AFA did indeed file complaints. Don't these people have anything better to do?


4 posted on 12/16/2004 11:20:51 AM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Using Powell's reasoning, there would be no limits regarding what could be shown and the law regarding indecent material would be null and void, " Wildmon said.

(sigh) I'll say it again--ABC wasn't televising "Debbie Does Dallas." It was the first truly realistic look (for the most part) at a pivotal time in the history of the world.

6 posted on 12/16/2004 11:23:50 AM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Stupid grandma leaver-outers!"--Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

i voted for dubya 2x, but this is just plain stupid.

you see, wait until the next democrat fcc and there will be some changes in the so-called fairness doctrine that folks who listen to talk radio will not like.

i view freedom of speech as inviolable.


8 posted on 12/16/2004 11:25:27 AM PST by ken21 (kerrycide = running 4 president on treasonous service in vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Its alright see people get killed in the grotesque ways of combat, but is isn't right to hear them say Oh, "F---!" when they get their legs blown off?. When I saw Pvt Ryan I didn't notice the language near as much the severed limbs and the exploding heads.

OTOH, I would hate to see the movie used an excuse to make the F word common to be used in prime time.

32 posted on 12/16/2004 11:43:00 AM PST by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I agree with the ruling ~ we don't need censorship ~ we need personal responsibility!

There was plenty of warning about the content of the movie.

I learned the "F" word in the first grade ~ I'm 74 and still use it ~ it works wonderfully as an adjective, noun and verb. :)


33 posted on 12/16/2004 11:46:11 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Applying the Michael Powell principle, "Boogie Nights" could be shown uncensored because the language and "adult situations" are accurate depictions of what takes place in the dehumanizing pornography industry. There are things that can be done to render a movie like "Private Ryan" less harmful, e.g. frequent violence warnings and muting the more offensive language.


34 posted on 12/16/2004 11:51:17 AM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Well, whether right or wrong, this is just going to give more ammo to Howard Stern, and his crazy theory that the FCC is out to get him and only him.

I don't believe that there's a specific vendetta or program against him, but instances like this give me pause. There really isn't any difference between when "bad" language is used on H.S. and in this movie. They're both being used in a conversational manner. So if anyone on this thread or reading this now didn't have a problem with Saving Private Ryan running, unedited, because the language in it was "conversational", then I hope you're consistent and let Stern off the hook for the same reason. And if you want to talk about sexual content being worse than the extreme violence in "Ryan"....sheesh, ok....anyone who thinks that "wins" this argument, I guess. :|

I mean really. It's becoming increasingly difficult, even for someone like me who loves this administration, to justify some of the actions of people chosen by it (in this case, Powell). Consistency is a *good* thing, sometimes, you know?


35 posted on 12/16/2004 11:52:06 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
ABC has no problem airing "Desperate Housewives" or the Monday Night Football promo which a naked Nicolette Sheridan jumped into Owen's arms.

Hypocrites, all of them....

36 posted on 12/16/2004 11:52:29 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I think we need to expand the rating system for movies shown on television. If the fword is used anywhere in the movie, then there must be an "F" superimposed on the screen in the lower right-hand corner. Make them flash the "F" for five seconds before the word is said, giving viewers ample time to change the channel, if they would be offended. See, there's at least one solution to every problem.


39 posted on 12/16/2004 11:54:37 AM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This situation is akin to "I can't tell you the difference between nude art and pornography but I know porn when I see it".  There was nothing inappropriate with dropping the f-bomb in Saving Private Ryan on network TV.

These hyper-prides at American Family Association need to get a life.

41 posted on 12/16/2004 12:04:54 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (“I know a greag deal about the Middle East because I’ve been raising Arabian horses" Patrick Swazey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Thanks Mike. Of course, the horse is already gone, but its nice to know the barn door is closed.


42 posted on 12/16/2004 12:06:02 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

From a parent's perspective, if I objected to my child hearing the Fword, I also objected to my child seeing the violence of real war. So I think it's a moot point, really. Show the film uneditted with a warning to parents of violence and adult language. The parents should make the decision to remove their children. My opinion.


43 posted on 12/16/2004 12:07:07 PM PST by peacebaby (smoked and enhaled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

This isn't about whether or not some or all of us use bad language, or whether SPR is or isn't a good movie.

The point really is that the FCC has established regulations and ABC TV knowingly violated them. The end (i.e. in this case some enlightenment about the horrors of war) doesn't justify the means. This is just another example of trying to change the law by backdoor methods.

Separate the issue of whether the "f word" should be permitted and debate it all you want for the future. But that issue has been decided under the FCCs interpretation of indecency and Michael Powell once again lacks the guts to enforce his agencies own rules. If you wonder what I mean, go check his record, he's as bad at Clinton when it comes to blowing in the political wind).


44 posted on 12/16/2004 12:08:08 PM PST by bigbob (2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I would like to point out to all who think that airing Saving Private Ryan in all of its gory, foulmouthed glory is the end of Western civilization as we know it, one thing.

NBC aired Schindler's List completely unedited in 1997, including every curse word, all the violence, and full frontal nudity, and I don't remember any such outcry to the FCC. Parental warnings were aired repeatedly during both movies that these films were not intended for the kiddies.

46 posted on 12/16/2004 12:10:42 PM PST by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("Oh no, not Hans Brix!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Does anyone else think that the FCC is getting out of control when 66 networks won't air Saving Private Ryan on Veteran's Day for fear of being fined or otherwise penalized?
47 posted on 12/16/2004 12:10:45 PM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

The thing about the the f-word in Private Ryan is that its use is neither gratuitous nor prurient.


48 posted on 12/16/2004 12:13:51 PM PST by Petronski (Shrum's losing streak obscures the fact that he is also a swine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

CHANGE THE CHANNEL.


51 posted on 12/16/2004 12:17:17 PM PST by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Good to see Wildman get slapped down here.

His pro-censorship crusade is killing us.

65 posted on 12/17/2004 12:40:02 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("BZZZZZT You are fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson