Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lords of the Rings star embraces Buddhism (Orlando Bloom)
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/9652-Lords_of_the_Rings_star_embraces_Buddhism.html ^

Posted on 12/09/2004 3:13:31 PM PST by fishtank

Lords of the Rings star embraces Buddhism

Item 9652 • Posted: Wed, Dec. 08 2004 • Weblogged by ReligionNewsBlog.com

Permalink to this article (Click link to copy to clipboard)

Hindustan Times (India), Dec. 6, 2004 http://www.hindustantimes.com

Another Hollywood star Orlando Bloom is to become a Buddhist. The Lord of the Rings star, 27, took part in an hour long ceremony at a centre to commit himself to the faith, according to a Mirror report.

Orlando, who jealously guards his private life, joined 60 other fledgling Buddhists at the Soka Gakkai International Buddhist movement HQ at Taplow Court Mansion in Maidenhead, Berkshire. A visitor was cited: "He looked really happy. He looked comfortable and quite excited."

Bloom was presented with his Gohonzon, a scroll with Chinese and Sanskrit characters on it. Dressed in jeans, a camel coloured sweater and shirt, he accepted his scroll from centre director Ricky Baynes. An onlooker said: "He shook Ricky's hand like the other people getting their Gohonzons and looked calm."

"When everyone had theirs we all clapped and cheered. Afterwards we all had a cup of tea together and Orlando went to the gift shop. People were queuing up to get his autograph and have their picture take with him. He was very friendly and didn't seem to mind."

Orlando said his Gohonzon would take place of pride in his home. It is likely to be kept in a wooden shrine, surrounded by candles. He would chant the holy Japanese mantra nam-myoho-renge-kyo to the scroll twice a day. He must also read and recite two chapters from the Lotus Sutra holy scripture.

Orlando, who played elf Legolas in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, has never publicly spoken about his religious faith but has often been seen clutching Buddhist prayer beads.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: buddhism; lotr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last
To: Conservative Canuck

Erowid? LOL... I have met Earth & Fire Erowid, and they're not exactly the people you'd want to refer to as experts on spirituality.


61 posted on 12/09/2004 3:58:41 PM PST by Nataku X (For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; 300winmag; Alkhin; Alouette; ambrose; Anitius Severinus Boethius; artios; AUsome Joy; ...

Ring Ping!!

The Hobbit Hole :: Troop Support Projects

Anyone wishing to be added to or removed from the Ring-Ping list, please don't hesitate to let me know.

62 posted on 12/09/2004 3:59:57 PM PST by ecurbh () | () | ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Is it just me or does Bloom remind anyone else of a slighly masculine-looking woman?


63 posted on 12/09/2004 4:00:14 PM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freecopper01

What I mean is that I cannot understand how anyone can believe in nothing. At least if someone has taken the time to believe in something or even think about it then I can understand.


64 posted on 12/09/2004 4:01:07 PM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck
Well, sort of. Shinto has nothing to do with Buddhism, actually - it predates it by quite a bit. It is, as you said, animistic. Buddhism came in from Korea in the 500's, I believe; its Zen variant somewhat later.

As you walk around in Japan it isn't at all unusual to see both sorts of temple in close proximity, attended by the same people. The Japanese tend to take their religion on a sort of "cash and carry" basis as opposed to Westerners who tend to make lifelong payments. (That is not, of course, true of Japanese Christians).

There is nothing inherently incompatible about killing and Buddhism; it simply is held that you pay in the next life for the negative karma you accumulate in this one. If a strict code of honor exonerates one from the negative karma in killing, then there may be no theoretical penalty. Strangely, only those sects into killing seem to hold that... ;-)

65 posted on 12/09/2004 4:01:15 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

:) hehehe, I have renamed some Hollywood actors as well, however none of them are flattering, LOL.


66 posted on 12/09/2004 4:01:41 PM PST by myvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD; All

Okay, okay! Sorry, I should have been clearer. What I meant was Buddhists never started religious wars like the Crusades, etc... What you're referring to was mostly tribal/warlord/drug trade related. :-)


67 posted on 12/09/2004 4:01:55 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

Wow


68 posted on 12/09/2004 4:01:59 PM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

ßudda ßump


69 posted on 12/09/2004 4:03:51 PM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gop_gene
Is it just me or does Bloom remind anyone else of a slighly masculine-looking woman?

I dunno. Russia invented manly women and I ain't seen any that even came close to that...

70 posted on 12/09/2004 4:04:16 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Varda

You mean you've seen the picture? I can't seem to get past the hairline!


71 posted on 12/09/2004 4:05:06 PM PST by myvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
The Japanese are an interesting case... they love religion, every religion. I once watched a TV show wherein a character was a temple priestess and a faithful attendee of Catholic mass. They are very difficult to evangelize because they cannot grasp the concept of mutual exclusiveness in religions. Strangely enough, for all their lip service to religions and rituals, they're about 85% atheist!

The liberals in the USA could use a good dose of their tolerance and acceptance for all religions.
72 posted on 12/09/2004 4:05:38 PM PST by Nataku X (For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: kingsurfer

Well, I look at Buddah more like a philosopher. By my definition it isn't really a religion. It does teach to do good and not do evil, and that is better than nothing.


73 posted on 12/09/2004 4:07:48 PM PST by Jay777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X

The Buddhism practiced by Hollywood celebrities and new-age hippie-types is very far removed from Buddhism as it should be practiced. I believe they give Buddhism a very bad reputation in this country.

While ritual has a large role in some schools of Buddhism, it is important not to get too caught up in ritual. It is more important to keep one's life in accordance with the principles of the religion.


74 posted on 12/09/2004 4:08:20 PM PST by AQGeiger (Have you hugged your soldier today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger

Agreed... I also feel that "real" Buddhism is more strict than Christianity in some ways.


75 posted on 12/09/2004 4:11:26 PM PST by Nataku X (For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: tet68; tdadams; JimSEA
PING

76 posted on 12/09/2004 4:12:53 PM PST by kanawa (Only losers look for exit strategies. Winners figure out how to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Here, Hollywood, let's take a short cut. Procedures:

1. Birth

2. Act

3. Succeed

4. Lose mind

77 posted on 12/09/2004 4:14:32 PM PST by Hi Heels (Proud to be a Pajamarazzi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingsurfer

" I cannot understand how anyone can believe in nothing. At least if someone has taken the time to believe in something or even think about it then I can understand. "

1) All religious people hold a belief in a Supernatural Creator.

2) An atheist is someone who holds a belief that there is no God.

3) An agnostic is someone who does not hold either belief 1 or 2 because they are philosophically "faith based" beliefs and agnostics typically (but not always) rely on skeptical methodology based philosophy.

Therefore it is technically accurate that an atheist believes in "nothing", or at least the absence of God, but an agnostic is a believer in the philosophy of the skeptical (scientific) method.

I hope this helps.




78 posted on 12/09/2004 4:19:10 PM PST by spinestein (Intolerance will not be tolerated !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: spinestein

The Buddhist concept of "nothingness" should not be understood as nihilism. The lack of an inherent nature is a great bit more subtle than that.


79 posted on 12/09/2004 4:22:28 PM PST by AQGeiger (Have you hugged your soldier today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

That won't last long... although it's better to embrace the Fatman's philosophy than switching over to Islamofascism like Cat Stevens did.


80 posted on 12/09/2004 4:26:19 PM PST by Kurt_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson