Skip to comments.
Man Gets 18 Months For Beating Puppy To Death
MaineToday.com ^
| 12/08/04
| Alan Crowell
Posted on 12/08/2004 12:45:36 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 301-302 next last
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Of course, we cannot hate both abortion and animal cruelty, right?
161
posted on
12/08/2004 2:03:58 PM PST
by
Bella_Bru
(You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
To: leadpencil1
neither do I but I also am not someone that would do something like this... these are not laws to help us live our lives, but laws to punish those who choose not to live in the bounds of normal society.
162
posted on
12/08/2004 2:03:59 PM PST
by
Americanwolf
(Democratic Underground... Digital Crack for the the loony left.....Hey troll! Put the pipe down!)
To: oldblackjoe
oldblackjoe wrote:
This has absolutely nothing to do with abortion, Einsteins.
THANK YOU!
163
posted on
12/08/2004 2:04:35 PM PST
by
tiamat
("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno-World!")
To: wideawake
The prosecutor is right. People who treat animals like this will inevitably treat a human being like this given a motive and the opportunity. Why not give them capital punishment now since they "will inevitably treat a human being like this gieven a motive and the opportunity?"
To: najida
Our laws must be as consistent as possible. If not, they are exploited and stretched to cover circumstance well-beyond what was meant or desired.
I know people here eat meat and therefore want animals killed. But the reasoning given by yourself and others has no limit. Your pest is another pet. Your steak is another's dead relative (think India).
That we are still eating meat is not a testament to the laws keeping us free to eat meat as it is that they've not been pressed far enough.
Case in point: Throughout time, homosexuals have not been allowed legal marriage. However, there was nothing prohibiting it save for common sense. So now we have a situation that has a life of its own and people are demanding an amendment to stop it all.
You must follow your argument to its logical limit. And you must have a logical way to combat another's position. Keeping animals as property is the only way to assure a gay-marriage-like problem won't occur with some nutball judge in the future. It will be a slow progression, but it is already happening with thoughts such as with those on this thread.
The Bible states that the intentional killing of one's animal requires monetary payment. Why can that not be enough?
To: exnavychick
Well, unlike the PETA dipsticks, most rational people can differentiate between killing an animal for food and killing one for peeing on the floor. Correct. Sophistocated thinkers understand the difference.
Sophisticated thinkers also understand the difference between an animal and an inanimate object.
Those who cannot are really not intelligent enough to debate.
166
posted on
12/08/2004 2:05:16 PM PST
by
Skooz
(The "holiday" has a name.)
To: ScottM1968
Yes, animals are property. However, we have laws that say you cannot treat this property cruelly. Deal with it. It's the law, and don't hold your breath waiting for any of us to enable the likes of you to change it.
My argument is the only rational answer.
A little megalomania going on here? Do you hear organ music when you type?
167
posted on
12/08/2004 2:06:10 PM PST
by
Melas
To: areafiftyone
And that is called "murder" because you'd be killing a person.
That is much worse than the death of an animal from any cause. And society (and God) will hold you accountable for that.
To: Skooz
Oops. Sophistocated = sophisticated. My glasses really need to be cleaned.
169
posted on
12/08/2004 2:07:11 PM PST
by
Skooz
(The "holiday" has a name.)
To: ScottM1968
Why can that not be enough? Because we believe differently. That is why we are having a logical discussion of why we have come to our beliefs, which are very, VERY different from yours.
Welcome to true conservatism sweetie pie.
170
posted on
12/08/2004 2:07:33 PM PST
by
najida
(Aunt to Miss Emily Ann- Cutest Baby in the World.)
To: ScottM1968
The Bible also says you can stone disobedient children and enslave people. Which can we do to you?
171
posted on
12/08/2004 2:07:37 PM PST
by
Bella_Bru
(You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
The guy would have gotten less time for rape or robbery.This is not even a remotely coherent "argument," on your part, in defense of a lessened sentence for the sociopath in question. (The only genuine "point," it advances, however inadvertently, is the pressing need to increase prison sentences for robbers and rapists; a premise with which none here have, or would, argue,)
It's a sick sick sick world that criminalizes puppy killing and legalizes baby killing.
False (and intellectually specious) "either/or" straw man, already long since discredited and set aflame, earlier in this thread. Go back and re-read, please.
172
posted on
12/08/2004 2:07:48 PM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: ScottM1968
Because when we give animals "people-like" status, we have totally opened the door to true animal rights. Why do you keep holding onto this statement? Who in this discussion has given animals "people-like status"? What the hell is "people-like status" anyways. Does that apply to computers, plants, our favorite shirt? What folks here are trying to tell you (though you can't seem to see it through your vegetarian fearing eyes) is we love our pets and can see the difference between a pet and a pest/problem. Anyone who would kill their pet is just as dangerous to other members of society as they are to their own pets. If you kill something you supposedly love for "fun" or out of frustration how should the rest of us in society feel when you don't even know us. It will take even less effort for you to kill us then the dog since you have zero emotional attachment to us. ScottM1968 I think you need to slow down a little and review your stance. You might want to check and make sure your prescription is current as well. Good Luck.
173
posted on
12/08/2004 2:08:01 PM PST
by
Americanwolfsbrother
(Democratic Underground: Home of the Mental Midget Society)
To: Bella_Bru
Both animals are property.
To: notigar
Sorry your quote does not reference animals at all. It's a reference to slavery which is not immoral in the sight of God. The Bible is NOT an egalitarian political tract. Speaking of which, George W.Bush should be roundly chastised by Christian conservatives for his "God wants people to be free" heresy.
To: Melas
My argument is the only rational answer.
A little megalomania going on here? Do you hear organ music when you type? he he he! great one!
YOU VIL COMPLY! YOU VIL BE ASSIMLIATED! ;)
176
posted on
12/08/2004 2:08:59 PM PST
by
najida
(Aunt to Miss Emily Ann- Cutest Baby in the World.)
To: af_vet_1981
To: Skooz
Boy, I really hope that you aren't implying that:
1) I cannot differentiate between a human and an animal. If so, perhaps you should read my other posts on this thread.
or
2) That because I don't agree with your views, that that means that I am stupid, and unworthy of debate. If you don't have differing views, you don't have a debate, you've got a mutual admiration society.
178
posted on
12/08/2004 2:09:27 PM PST
by
exnavychick
(Just my two cents, as usual.)
To: Melas
A little megalomania going on here? Do you hear organ music when you type? What's your home mailing address, please? I want to make certain you receive this itemized bill for my new monitor screen and keyboard. :)
179
posted on
12/08/2004 2:09:38 PM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: exnavychick
No no no no no no......I was agreeing with you.
Re-read my post. :0)
180
posted on
12/08/2004 2:10:43 PM PST
by
Skooz
(The "holiday" has a name.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 301-302 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson