Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teamsters boss Jim Hoffa was the election's big loser
Manchester Union Leader ^ | December 7, 2004 | Peter Flaherty

Posted on 12/07/2004 5:07:08 AM PST by billorites

ORGANIZED labor was an undisputed election-day loser, but John Kerry's defeat was a particular blow to Teamsters chief Jim Hoffa. For Hoffa, who worked hard for Kerry after endorsing Richard Gephardt in the primaries, the election was about much more than access or influence. It was about getting the 1.3 million-member Teamsters out from under federal government oversight, in place since 1989.

The stakes for Hoffa were so high because of a burgeoning controversy that exploded with the April 28 resignation of Edwin Stier, the former federal prosecutor hired by the Teamsters to clean up the union. Stier charged that Hoffa had "backed away" and "inexplicably retreated" from anticorruption efforts.

Although the controversy concerns six Teamsters locals in Chicago, it goes to the heart of Hoffa's credibility and reputation. The Teamsters are refusing to release Stier's 303-page report on the six locals. According to the Chicago Tribune, which obtained a copy, the report details "allegations of mob influence, kickback schemes and the secret shifting of union jobs to low-wage, non-union companies." Stier asserted that he encountered "active resistance" from Hoffa's office in investigating these allegations.

Stier did not work for the government. In 1999, the Teamsters established an internal reform program and hired Stier. It was a way of staving off more serious scrutiny, and of showing "good faith" in hopes of eventually escaping government oversight. While it lasted, it was good work for Stier.

The Teamsters spent $15 million on the program, much of which flowed through Stier's law firm. Since he was never really "independent," Stier's resignation is all the more devastating to Hoffa. Ultimate authority for Teamsters oversight resides with something called the Independent Review Board (IRB), established as a result of a 1989 consent decree to settle a Justice Department racketeering lawsuit. Now that the Stier operation has imploded, the time is hardly ripe for Hoffa to argue for the disbanding of the IRB.

Ironically, the Teamsters had made tentative progress toward walking on their own with the current Bush administration and Republicans in Congress. Early on, an eager White House political staff courted Hoffa. There was talk of "working together" on issues like oil drilling in Alaska. But freeing the Teamsters was the real, never-acknowledged agenda. The relationship, however, soured as Hoffa claimed that the policy gap on issues like free trade was just too large to bridge.

During the campaign, Hoffa asserted that the moneyed Kerry is "one of us" because Kerry briefly held a union card in 1962. About Kerry's opposition to opening the Alaska wilderness to oil exploration, Hoffa lamely offered that Kerry had assured him that he would "drill like never before" elsewhere. Hoffa apparently also got over Kerry's support for NAFTA and other trade agreements.

Republicans should feel lucky that the courtship of Hoffa never led to anything more serious. Richard Nixon famously enjoyed the support of Hoffa's still-missing father, and Ronald Reagan won the support of Teamsters president Jackie Presser. It is doubtful, however, whether Republicans have benefited politically from the support of corrupt union bosses. A better approach would be a renewed Justice Department crackdown on mob influence in labor unions. It worked for Robert Kennedy, who became a hero to many in the rank-and-file.

In his resignation letter, Stier stated that he had "substantial reliable information that organized crime again threatens the union." He cited two specific examples of how Hoffa personally impeded his investigations, and in one of the cases, he accused the union of being "insensitive to witnesses' justifiable fears of retaliation." The bad old Teamsters are back. Or maybe they never really went away.

Peter Flaherty is president of the National Legal and Policy Center, a nonpartisan foundation promoting ethics in public life. The group publishes a bi-weekly newsletter titled "Union Corruption Update."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hoffa; kerrydefeat; losers; thugs; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/07/2004 5:07:08 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: billorites

Pat Buchanan thought Jimmy Hoffa was good enough to be asked to be his VP.

I'm glad neither one, Jimmy or Pat, is in power.


2 posted on 12/07/2004 5:13:51 AM PST by KidGlock (W-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
The Bush administration had several notable moments of gullibility in the first four years......trying to make nicey-face with a Hoffa being one.

I hope the President takes a closer look at his "compassionate conservatism" this term. I would prefer just "conservatism".

Leni

3 posted on 12/07/2004 5:14:01 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Basically, last April Hoffa was sure that Bush was going to lose, so he alienated his in-house investigator and put all his chips on a Democratic victory, hoping that he wouldn't have to make any compromises to keep his criminal enterprise going.

We need strong right to work laws in every state and unions who intimidate need to be aggressively prosecuted under RICO just like any other criminal enterprise.

4 posted on 12/07/2004 5:16:27 AM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Fat chance of a RICO indictment against a union which
puts out a fairly large and consostent voting block
every election.


5 posted on 12/07/2004 5:27:48 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Edwin Stier, the former federal prosecutor hired by the Teamsters to clean up the union.

That's a bit like cleaning up a mud puddle, when you're finished there's nothing left

6 posted on 12/07/2004 5:31:59 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

dittos.

if bat puckanan were pres, there'd be a trade war, if not world war.


7 posted on 12/07/2004 5:34:21 AM PST by ken21 (against the democrat plantation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

Unions have been prosecuted before. And the Teamsters' voting block isn't as fat as people think, and it is getting thinner every year.


8 posted on 12/07/2004 5:34:21 AM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Public employee unions are starting to muscle-in to government policy decision-making, government officials say. And they are being aided in their efforts by President Clinton himself…….(Federal employee unions)

ORGANIZED labor’s real competition – “Public employee” is a misnomer for federal workers who number in the thousands and are in direct competition with the private citizen – who unwittingly pay their salaries through their federal and state taxes. Question is who is the greater thief, the Mob controlled Unions or the United States Government.A bigger question - is it Constitutional for the federal employee to unionize and in many cases, work against their true employer, the one who pays their salaries, the American Citizen………………??

9 posted on 12/07/2004 5:39:08 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
"the secret shifting of union jobs to low-wage, non-union companies"

The Democrats operate an international labor pool that supplies workers at low wages. The unions get to continue their pay scale on a site development, by allowing cost cuts on some jobs, that is work done by workers from the international labor pool. Limousine Liberals and RINO's, who are the "bi-partisan" Real Estate Investment Trust operators, get site development approval (of all kinds of structures that are not up to code).

The unions, Limousine Liberals, and RINO's, all maintain their income streams and cash flow rates, as long as federal and State administrators keep the borders open to "people who will work," according to the Bush Administration.

See: They just keep coming!!!!! - article from the Indianapolis Star, posted to Free Republic on Feb. 24, 2003.

See: Probe Of Scam At BMV Widens (Indiana) - article by Fred Kelly, from the Indianapolis Star, posted to Free Republic on Dec. 10, 2003.

I mention these two articles, because it was about Indianapolis, that I learned of the underground, international labor pool operated by the Democrats.

Asbestos removal and chemicals cleanup, are typical of the jobs assigned to such foreign workers.

10 posted on 12/07/2004 5:48:15 AM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

"The group publishes a bi-weekly newsletter titled "Union Corruption Update."
Nonpartisan? Twenty four issues a year. I would say the group is anti-blue collar worker.
However, Hoffa was out of line. The Teamsters have frequently supported Republican presidential candidates.It's time for the feds to dive into the Teamsters again.


11 posted on 12/07/2004 5:50:00 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
A bigger question - is it Constitutional for the federal employee to unionize and in many cases, work against their true employer, the one who pays their salaries, the American Citizen?

...Excellent point. :)

12 posted on 12/07/2004 6:04:45 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: billorites
I once read an article about James Riddle Hoffa, which made me think more of him. He really was a tough character.

His real mistake was thinking he could deal with the mafia without being compromised by them.

13 posted on 12/07/2004 6:13:00 AM PST by Shanda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Aren't those federal employees American citizens who are working for the same reason that most people work, self-interest? In fact self-interest is the founding pillar of capitalism. We can't fault self-interest though it is rewarding to meet those who work to improve the lot of others before themself. I think I just discribed the basis of Christanity.
I am sure that the constitution doesn't say anything about unionization. Nor does it say much about most things.We are left at the mercy of the Supreme Court.


14 posted on 12/07/2004 6:13:33 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee

Thought you'd enjoy this one. ;)


15 posted on 12/07/2004 6:15:28 AM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Not only was he a big loser in the election, but he will be an even bigger loser when Bush orders Beck enforced!


16 posted on 12/07/2004 8:09:38 AM PST by jmaroneps37 ( Frist/ Blackwell in 2008 for a landslide: you saw it here first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
thanks ........ sometimes the apple can fall pretty far from the tree

.

17 posted on 12/07/2004 3:11:18 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
and Ed Steir is a leach, he has never drawn a paycheck from any entity which had to show a profit ..... it's a pox on all their houses

.

18 posted on 12/07/2004 3:16:05 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
but he will be an even bigger loser when Bush orders Beck enforced!

What's he waiting for?

19 posted on 12/08/2004 6:10:45 AM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yoe
is it Constitutional for the federal employee to unionize and in many cases, work against their true employer, the one who pays their salaries, the American Citizen………………??

No public employees should be allowed to unionize. I give you teachers unions as a good example why.

20 posted on 12/08/2004 6:56:04 AM PST by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson