[BobL]

This is a womam of courage. Imagine, if you will, a Congressman in hiding 24/7 because a religion of kooks is out to kill him. Yet she presses on. Let's hear it for Ms. Hirsi Ali.

[ariamne]

Here, here. This woman is truly courageous and I hope she doesn't end up like Theo van Gogh, Alan Berg or Veronica Guerin. The lawyer representing these scum who want to stifle dissent--his name appears to be Jewish. Is he nuts?

[Kurt_D]

Is there anyway possible we can have this movie relaesed in this USA?

[freedumb2003]

without differentiating Islam from radical Islam

That is because there is no difference. One is public, the other private. The goals are the same, the desire to remove all infidels is the same, the worship of a pedophile (may he rot in hell forever between two pigs) is the same.

[weenie]

A small group of Muslims in the Netherlands are preparing a lawsuit to block a sequel to Submission

Islam hates the truth as evil hates the light.

The truth about Islam can be seen in what it does, not what is says.

[dagnabbit]

bttt

[Guillermo]

**Imagine, if you will, a Congressman in hiding 24/7 because a religion of kooks is out to kill him**

Mark Dayton?

[BJungNan]

Submission criticised how women are treated under Islam, and was considered insulting by many Dutch Muslims. It showed virtually naked Muslim women in headscarves with verses from the Qur'an written on their bodies.

That's pretty insulting, pretty bad.

The murder of the film maker did not help the Dutch Muslim's cause. But with this known, they likely would have gotten a sympathetic ear from other religions that have been peed on by the liberals.

No matter what you think of someone's religion, they are going to be upset when scenes like this appear.

[Dec31,1999]

It showed virtually naked Muslim women in headscarves with verses from the Qur'an written on their bodies.

They never say what verses, though. I wonder why. Does anybody know?

[Eastbound]

"It accused Hirsi Ali of labelling Islam dangerous "without differentiating Islam from radical Islam"."

The most congitively dissonant statement I've heard all week. How does non-radical Islam defend itself against being called radical? By killing those who say they are dangerous? Yeah, that makes sense.

[VOA]

Dutch Muslims want to block critical film

I love the journalistic wiggle-words...
Since when is "truthful" translated as "critical"?
Hey, the Muslims must have studied the tactics of the "Sinclair Broadcasting
Suppression Team" of The Kerry Campaign.

Actually, Islamics are just as practiced at supression of the ugly truth
about their activities as Democrats are.
They got terrorism expert Stephen Emerson off of NPR with a phone campaign (IIRC)
and even mostly muzzled radio-icon Paul Harvey.

With Dubya returned, we gotta' tell these Islamic activists that they can talk,
talk, talk all they want...
AND they CAN'T shut up people who tell the truth about them.

That's why we aren't going to be the North American colony of Eurabia.
Like Canada.

[VOA]

A small group of Muslims in the Netherlands are preparing a lawsuit to block
a sequel to Submission, the movie scripted by a right-wing lawmaker and directed
by a slain Dutch filmmaker.

Translation:
"Please stop showing a film that tells the truth about how women are too often
treated in true Islamic fashion.
If you Dutch keep showing that film, we'll have to behead, shoot and
savagely stab some more of you in the streets. And it will be all your fault."

[airborne]

Be prepares for "peaceful" bombings of theatres that show this movie.