Posted on 12/02/2004 9:14:19 AM PST by Darnright
*slaps himself in the forehead*
oi...its going to be a long day...
thanks for the corrections (I forgot "Sanger" was polluting society in the 10s and 20s... before Mein Kampf)
Unbelievable, but I bet all these people have heard of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay thanks to the liberal Brit media.
Teaching the history of Hitler is inconvenient to the left because he thrived because of Britain and France's appeasement policies. The same policies the left advocates today.
And how many of them are totally unaware that the current development for euthenasia in Holland fits the Fascist template more perfectly than the Socialist one?
Anyone that took GCSE History (14 -16 year olds) would know this. But our school system is mucked up. Nowadays you dont have to take a language or history as well as many other things yet they still make them play rugby.
Normally, you can't go through high school without an intensive session about WW2.
I don't know if it's in Great Britain (as I suppose it is), but in France you spend time studying the Holocaust, and usually you get to see a documentary like Lanzmann's "Shoah", or "Nacht und Nebel", so there should be absolutely no way such a high percentile of people would not know Auschwitz or Dachau.
Mind you most people are idiots so we should not be surprised.
Most people do not know thatthe British Channel Islands were inaveded and massive death/work camps set up on them.
It was te only part of Britain to be conquered in Europe by the Nazis. My family lived there during that time and it was very very bad yet you will hear very little about it now. They used to have to smuggle what food scraps they had to the prisoners of war as the Nazis did not even feed them.
I wonder how many have heard about Oswiecim.
Of course the know nothings would form a big part of the anti American vote. They're idiots.
Survey them on "The Nanking Massacre". I bet fewer than 1 in 20 has ever heard of it. It's likely as bad in the US.
Thanks for using the right place name. Auschwitz is a German name. I wonder how many haven't heard of the others in Poland: Majdanek, Sobibor, Belzec, Treblinka, and Chelmno?
She and her socialist cronies saw it more as a 'cleansing' of society. Removing the 'undesirable' genetic material. And, of course, they get to pick who will be classified as undesirable.
Exactly. The Nazi Party is alive nd well. It's just been redefined as "progressive".
I seriously doubt that even 25% of Americas over 18 know about Auschwitz.
I'm well aware of the popular name of this event.
Are you trying to make some intelligent point with that change? Was it not a massacre? Were not 300,000 people murdered? That is not a rape, that's a massacre.
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. Unbelievable is all that comes to mind.
They weren't called "National Socialists" for nothing.
Belsen used to be the camp Brits knew about, because it was liberated by the Brits, just as Buchenwald was best known (after Auswitz), in the US. I don't know if that make would have made a difference in the survey results.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.