Skip to comments.
WI Poll: Should police in Wisconsin be able to ticket just for seatbelt violations?
WEAU TV 13 ^
| 11/30/2004
| WEAU TV 13
Posted on 11/30/2004 5:20:33 PM PST by quietolong
Should police in Wisconsin be able to ticket just for seatbelt violations?
NO
yes
Click on excerpt link to go to poll
(Excerpt) Read more at weau.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Wisconsin; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: nannygoverment; nannystate; seatbeltlaw; unconstitutionallaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
NO!
One more unconstitutional Nanny ( we Think we know whats best for you ) Government law. Which we were told would never be used to stop you with.
What they dont tell you. And is suppressed big time. Is all the deaths and injures seatbelts cause!
clicking on you seatbelt on is a 50-50 proposition 50% chance it will save you 50% chance it will kill you.
As with the helmet laws. Let those who drive deside.
( maybe there needs to be a helmet law for cars too)/s
To: quietolong
The coppers can do it here south of the WI border in IL. It sucks. I wear my belt all the time anyway, but ticketing someone who is stupid enough not to wear it is just plain annoying.
2
posted on
11/30/2004 5:22:02 PM PST
by
metalmanx2j
(Thank the Good Lord for George W. Bush)
To: quietolong
No. I think they should also be able to ticket anyone who owns property since the whole world now knows that all the land on the planet belongs to Robert Mugabe, President of Zimbabwe, since he is the closest living relative of Lucy.
3
posted on
11/30/2004 5:23:59 PM PST
by
Cornpone
((Aging Warrior))
To: metalmanx2j
Heck even in MA, they can't stop you for it. They can however stop you for anything else, and ticket you for not wearing a seatbelt.
4
posted on
11/30/2004 5:24:55 PM PST
by
gidget7
(God Bless America, and our President George W. Bush)
To: quietolong
Seatbelts actually make people better drivers. An individual is better able to control his vehicle when he's not swaying and being pushed about his seat with the acceleration, or turning of the Vehicle. Ineritia
So there are less accidents
5
posted on
11/30/2004 5:27:37 PM PST
by
LauraleeBraswell
(See and decide for yourself)
To: metalmanx2j
They ticket us here in Indiana for no seatbelts, too.
6
posted on
11/30/2004 5:30:19 PM PST
by
Lovergirl
(Proud member of the Pajama Brigade.)
To: LauraleeBraswell
yaaa. but what about when you go tru da ice while
fishin for da carp? (sarcasm)
They can't (yet) pull you over for no seat belt in MN, but
seeing how the feds will withhold highway funding if states
don't play ball, it's only a matter of time. Besides, any cop with a year on the force can figure out another reason/ excuse to pull you over to justify cause.
7
posted on
11/30/2004 5:31:10 PM PST
by
Rakkasan1
(Justice of the Piece: Hope IS on the way...)
To: LauraleeBraswell
While I agree with the points made in your post, I do not agree that the government should, in essence, put a GUN to your head to force you to wear one.
Just as JHVH supposedly left us the free will to "sin", so should our government honor our Right to be Free, but stupid.
8
posted on
11/30/2004 5:32:07 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: quietolong
No. If they can't even ask you if you're an illegal alien, they shouldn't be able to make you wear a seat belt.
To: gidget7
Heck even in MA, they can't stop you for it.
Even though that is the way it was voted in as a law in MA, the police are now pulling over people without any other cause.
10
posted on
11/30/2004 5:39:49 PM PST
by
ProudVet77
(Just say NO to blue states.)
To: LauraleeBraswell
" Seatbelts actually make people better drivers. An individual is better able to control his vehicle when he's not swaying and being pushed about his seat with the acceleration, or turning of the Vehicle. Ineritia So there are less accidents"Amazing!
11
posted on
11/30/2004 5:41:58 PM PST
by
spunkets
To: quietolong
Florida you get ticketed if you don't wear a seatbelt.
12
posted on
11/30/2004 5:42:00 PM PST
by
Ginifer
To: quietolong
I wear my belt all the time because if I am in an accident without it, the auto insurance companies can dispute paying for injuries.
To: spunkets
You don't have to be sarcastic and you wouldn't be if you read the first post by quietolong, who claims seatbelts kill as many people as they save.
To: quietolong
Nanny govm't. That's what all the clowns want.
15
posted on
11/30/2004 5:45:51 PM PST
by
spunkets
To: Dead Corpse; Old Phone Man
And when insurance refuses to pay the injuries bill, and if you can't afford it, guess who pays for it.
The government
and I think that If the government has got to pay for medical bills incurred because you didn't wear a seat belt , they ought to have the right to tell you to wear one
To: quietolong
When our seatbelt law in Michigan was enacted they swore up and down that they would never stop someone for a seatbelt violation alone. Today they can do exactly that.
Seatbelts are a top notch idea but a really bad law.
17
posted on
11/30/2004 5:50:38 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(I come swinging the olive branch of peace.)
To: LauraleeBraswell
I wasn't being sarcastic. You can beleive whatever you want, but you are wrong. They do not make for better drivers. The only thing that makes better for better drivers is focus on controlling the vehicle. Learning and understanding the machine and being able to control it, and keeping aware of the driving course is the only way to be a better driver. Maintaining control of the car is what it's all about, not loading up with features that compensate for deficiency. Seatbelts are a feature that compensates for deficiencies, they are not driving tools, or aids.
Seatbelts do kill some people and so do airbags. I hate both.
18
posted on
11/30/2004 5:55:45 PM PST
by
spunkets
To: LauraleeBraswell
"I think that If the government has got to pay for medical bills incurred because you didn't wear a seat belt , they ought to have the right to tell you to wear one"Why not just rename the US- Mommy.gov and be done with it. To hell with Freedom. All we need is Mommy.gov.
19
posted on
11/30/2004 5:58:01 PM PST
by
spunkets
To: quietolong
20
posted on
11/30/2004 5:58:06 PM PST
by
Ptarmigan
(Proud rabbit hater and killer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson