Posted on 11/29/2004 12:39:51 PM PST by neverdem
How do you figure? They had to lie and distort the facts about the Bush administration as it was and that means the only way they can win is to deceive.
Perhaps you could expound upon your curious thought (it frankly sounds absurd on its face).
Well, you sound nuts in addition to being flat out wrong.
Name one thing the gigilo ever did that required effort. GWB has a list a mile long and none include his "daddy".
And in a society that prides itself on hundreds of choices in soap, soda, soup or sex videos, the American people had their choice limited to these two Yalie bonesmen.
As to someone that asserts there are similarities between Kerry and Bush, well, one must have sub-par intelligence in the moron category to state such.
Another words...Lieberman!
Oh, they have a few qualified candidates. Lieberman or Zell Miller come to mind. Given the leftist nature of the domb-o-crap party, they could never get the nomination.
Good article. bump!
Enlighten me!
As I understand it, W went into the oil drilling business, drove dry wells, but was bought out for a bundle anyway. Then he went into the baseball business, headed a consortium that used the power of eminent domain to condemn land for a stadium, and then used city tax revenues to build the stadium for his team. And made a bundle. The family name and connections had nothing to do with this?
and you be sure to have a nice day Too!
Your "understanding" is wrong.
Lieberman would not have beaten George W. Bush and Miller supported him. The assertion was made that Bush could be beaten by means other than lying, etc. The obvious fact is that is false.
We can be greatly encouraged by the fact that the MSM threw everything they could at Pres. Bush, including making things up when they ran out of ammo, and he still won.
Other than Zell Miller, who might that have been?
As much as I admire "H", "W" has proven to be a much better leader and president than his father.
"Sadly," the Captain is no longer among the living.
I see that you're conveniently leaving out the fact that GW Bush made MAJOR changes to the education system in Texas and both Hispanic and Black educators in that state credit him with literally saving the lives of tens of thousands of minority children.
Previously, children were taught by the newer "whole language skills" vs. phonics. Educators in the very best schools in the nation say that phonics is the only way to teach a child to read but the elites around the country have decided that keeping kids dumb is the only way to garner votes for the DNC.
His family name didn't have anything to do with that accomplishment. Didn't have anything to do with his other accomplishments either, btw.
....."How do you figure?"......
One half the voting population, give or take, are RATS.
Some of us devout Pubbies see our President as a caring individual, who took charge after 9-11.
But without that disaster and his chance to formulate the "Bush doctrine", his inarticulateness; inability to speak coherently; and the media making him out to be Cheney's puppet, he would surely have been doomed. His war in Afganistan to clean out the cockroaches was carried out brilliantly, but we stopped short of a full court press on Binnie.
Our foray into Iraq, with all good intentions was doomed to not find WMD, as we amassed at the border and played twiddlewinks while the UN didn't have the balls to act on it's resolutions. I'm positive that in the dark of the night, all the bad stuff was being buried under the sands or harbored in another country, just waiting for the infidels to go home: yet we're not even protecting our borders
Saddam shouldn't have the Geneva convention to fall back on, he needs an immediate hit of sodium penathol (sp?) to open up his tongue, so we can end this war. The rest of the dirty ragheads need to be exterminated. We're bogged down while our guys are being killed and wounded, and us pubbies know it.
If the RATS had been able to find a credible candidate who could have articulated a positive message, I think that there are enough Pubbies who would have voted for other than Bush.
But, on the other hand, what a sorry band of fools that their party tried to foist off on America, and Kerry was the worst of them!
"Any American was free to write-in Pat Buchanan."
Not in my state. Write-ins are not allowed. But that's alright, I'm happy with whom I voted for.
Those who voted for John Kerry - in some cases, against George Bush - have reacted to the election with a smug superiority seldom seen. Herewith some quotes from Kerry supporters (or Bush opponents):
-I'm saddened by what I feel is the obtuseness and shortsightedness of a good part of the country - the heartland. This kind of redneck, shoot-from-the-hip mentality and a very concrete interpretation of religion is prevalent in Bush country - in the heartland. New Yorkers are more sophisticated and at a level of consciousness where we realize we have to think of globalization, of one mankind, that what's going to injure masses of people is not good for us. - New Yorker Joseph Zito
http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD%2FMGArticle%2FRTD_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031779394271&path=%21editorials&s=1045855934983
Evan Thomas
Ooh, thanks for the news.
Farewell, Captain, we barely knew ye...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.