Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WTO Ready for U.S. Sanctions
Reuters ^ | Thursday November 25, 11:07 AM EST | Unknown

Posted on 11/25/2004 9:46:36 AM PST by Navydog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: pillbox_girl
So let me get this straight: we are facing sanctions because we have laws on our books designed to prevent companies in other countries from destroying our own industries through the practice of product "dumping". In other words, if Sony wants to drive all U.S. VCR makers out of business, they can undercut their prices by selling at a loss just long enough to eliminate the homegrown competition and then raise prices again (which they actually did). And a U.S. law to prevent this is "illegal"? What makes it "illegal"? Is this supposed a violation of "international law" (whatever that is). And who the hell legislates international law anyways? I sure didn't vote for (or against) them? Or are we just seeing the WTO as it really is, a tool for subverting national sovereignty for corporate sovereignty?

Shucks, try as they do, we the USA, still is the only remaining financial superpower, and has maintained this status through DECADES of insistence to abstain from giving up our "God" given rights as individuals.

How can something so wrong work out to be so right?

21 posted on 11/25/2004 10:42:21 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

$150 million is chump change compared to our foreign trade. I say BRING. IT. ON!


22 posted on 11/25/2004 10:45:08 AM PST by Jagman (or was that I'VE. GOT. YOUR. BACK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
It is time for investing to once again become a serious business worthy of long term investment strategies.

It has been for decades, for me, and will continue to be for as the world turns, the market only moves in one direction on a long term basis and that direction is up! It has been, is, and will continue to be the case, and along with that trend the opportunity of "easier living" and the contentment of financial security will be a convincing factor for most that the Forefathers had the right idea emphasizing personal freedoms and if you feel that we haven't continued that focus through world changes then my friend you are lost to the American way.

23 posted on 11/25/2004 10:54:32 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Navydog
Don't really know what exactly this excerpted article says, but to the WTO I say, GFY.

HAPPY THANKSGIVING all!

FMCDH(BITS)

24 posted on 11/25/2004 11:23:00 AM PST by nothingnew (Kerry is gone...perhaps to Lake Woebegone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

What goods will be affected by the sanctions? 160 million is peanuts in the wine or olive oil trade.


25 posted on 11/25/2004 11:37:43 AM PST by hubno (hub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
"Lest we forget the investor, for the speculation alone would create a market turmoil."

"the market only moves in one direction on a long term basis and that direction is up!"

????what's the problem????
26 posted on 11/25/2004 11:40:09 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

U.S. consumers can easily impose trade sanctions on the EU. Simply choose not to buy goods from EU countries whenever possible.


27 posted on 11/25/2004 11:43:01 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Sorry,I didn't read to the bottom.Sweet corn,some metals and textiles.
We can oick up the 150 million in wheat,rye,soy,gold,silver & plastics.in about one day.


28 posted on 11/25/2004 11:45:49 AM PST by hubno (hub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
????what's the problem????

Wrong! It is time for investing to once again become a serious business worthy of long term investment strategies. Investing on a fad is poor substitute for investing on substance.

Investing IS a serious business, however savvy in doing so on an individual basis varies considerably, if concerns are present because of inappropriate use of our system through concerns of individual gain, they should be nipped at the bud, taken care of appropriately, and we move on.

Personally, I feel that a misuse of our system by some is taken by most as a system that is corrupt. Such a mindset I take as foolish thinking.

I hope I have conveyed my reply in an understandable fashion to you ARCADIA.

Regards,

29 posted on 11/25/2004 11:59:22 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hubno
What goods will be affected by the sanctions?

Speculation and fear in trading.

30 posted on 11/25/2004 12:01:38 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Navydog
When you read the details of the article, it becomes clear that these sanctions won't affect consumers, and probably won't affect any American companies. It's like some left-wing, feel-good sanction.

We can't dump low quality products onto your markets in order to drive the prices of your inventions down, so we'll stop selling you people low quality products!

We went through all this with China before. The Chinese are far worse than the Japanese ever were during the '80's.

Actually, to a Mid East analyst, the reasoning sounds creepily like something a terrorist would say in a Reuters headline.

31 posted on 11/25/2004 12:06:11 PM PST by cake_crumb (The IQ of the average Democrat voter is slightly less than body temperature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

...And after posting the reply and scrolling up, I see it's a Reuters articla.


32 posted on 11/25/2004 12:06:50 PM PST by cake_crumb (The IQ of the average Democrat voter is slightly less than body temperature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
From wnece came the WTO? Upon who's watch did it come to be?

The WTO was ratified by us during a lame-duck session of Congress in 1994. Just as the lame-duck session is now considering LOST and the FTAA.

It's that whole "mandate" thing, don'cha know.

33 posted on 11/25/2004 12:07:11 PM PST by inquest (Now is the time to remove the leftist influence from the GOP. "Unity" can wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: inquest

What is amazing is politicians broke this and these are the same politicians now trying to fix what they broke.


34 posted on 11/25/2004 12:54:25 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (60 votes and the world changes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Soapbox The hell with the WTO. Maybe if we would stop buying their products for awhile they'd get the message.
35 posted on 11/25/2004 1:34:09 PM PST by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

No problem, we'll just deduct the WTO fines from next year's UN appropriation.


36 posted on 11/25/2004 2:00:01 PM PST by Veritas et equitas ad Votum (If the Constitution "lives and breathes", it dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

Reuters is really getting stupid at headlines.

"WTO Ready for U.S. Sanctions" does not equal the text, "The World Trade Organization cleared the way on Thursday to impose $150 million of trade sanctions on the United States."


37 posted on 11/25/2004 2:44:17 PM PST by GretchenM (Pray for President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

Where are the idiots that said this couldn't happen?


38 posted on 11/25/2004 5:47:51 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Blocking our imports will just make their THE euro go Higher, bad for them.


39 posted on 11/25/2004 5:50:25 PM PST by Haro_546 (Christian Zionist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Haro_546

Foreign investments in teasuries. It's not a laughing matter.


40 posted on 11/25/2004 5:51:43 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson