Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Okla. Law Allows Guns on Company Property
fox ^ | 11-14-04

Posted on 11/14/2004 4:58:38 PM PST by LouAvul

TULSA, Okla. — In Oklahoma, "Take Your Gun to Work Day" could be every day — but some employers are trying to change that.

Whirlpool Corp. (WHR) has sued to block a new law that allows employees to keep guns in their locked vehicles on workplace parking lots. The law was scheduled to take effect Nov. 1, according to the Associated Press, but a federal judge blocked it. Only Kentucky has a similar law.

Whirlpool, which is trying to save its ban on firearms (search) on company property, believes workplace safety should override the rights of gun owners.

"This is a standard company rule that's intended to protect employees ... and to minimize the risk of any incident occurring," Whirlpool said in a statement to FOX News.

Tulsa police are similarly concerned about the prospect of violence in the workplace.

.......snip..........

State Rep. Jerry Ellis (search), a Democrat, believes that keeping guns off employer property won't prevent workplace violence.

"People that are going to do violence in the workplace ... it doesn't make any difference how many laws that you have on the books. They have no respect for the law and they're going to do it anyway," Ellis told FOX News.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Kentucky; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2004 4:58:38 PM PST by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
"People that are going to do violence in the workplace ... it doesn't make any difference how many laws that you have on the books. They have no respect for the law and they're going to do it anyway," Ellis told FOX News.

Bears repeating.

2 posted on 11/14/2004 5:02:40 PM PST by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
It looks like this issue is being presented as workplace safety vs. gun owner's rights. This misses the most important aspect of this law.

The focus should be on property rights. In my opinion, if I own a parking lot, I should be able to determine what things are allowed on that lot and which things are prohibited. I am against state-imposed gun control, but if someone doesn't want firearms on THEIR property, they should be allowed to make that decision. No one is forcing anyone to work for am anti-gun private employer.

3 posted on 11/14/2004 5:04:21 PM PST by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Great now the criminals just found them self some more easy targets for robbery, rape and mayhem.


4 posted on 11/14/2004 5:09:16 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
State Rep. Jerry Ellis (search), a Democrat, believes that keeping guns off employer property won't prevent workplace violence.

Wow.. a Democrat that "gets it". Worth noting.

Some companies are saying that they have the right to restrict people from having guns in their cars that are *not* parked on company property.

5 posted on 11/14/2004 5:13:46 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

And how upset would they be if, as I pulled in the gate, I handed the guard my weapon and asked for a claim-check?

What do the expect, people to toss it out the window before pulling in off the street?

This is NOT frivolous.

I lived a mile up a dirt logging road, 7 miles from the nearest hamlet, and 25 miles from the hospital in town where I worked. There was always a pistol, and often also a rifle, in the car...I had CCW and a hunting license, and often went shooting, hunting, or fishing after getting off work at 7 AM. A lot of the nurses and techs lived in the boonies, too, and darn sure did not drive to work at 11 pm unarmed, especially not after one was run off the road & raped one night.

What is kept in a locked vehicle is not the employer's business, nor anyone elses, as long as it isn't creating a public nuisance or public hazard.


6 posted on 11/14/2004 5:17:24 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timm22
The focus should be on property rights. In my opinion, if I own a parking lot, I should be able to determine what things are allowed on that lot and which things are prohibited.

So, if you work for me and park in my lot, I can ban your car from displaying a John Kerry bumpersticker?

Of course not, the First Amendment trumps my property rights.

Just as the Second Amendment trumps Whirlpool's property rights here.

7 posted on 11/14/2004 5:24:06 PM PST by John Thornton ("Appeasers always hope that the crocodile will eat them last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
This would rally make it bad for shift workers, especially women.

To have to get off at eleven or three in the morning or go in for that matter and have to drive an hour or so to get to work or home with no protection in case of a break down .

Lots of times these jobs are in the worst part of town around docks and warehouses or you have to go through them to get there.

Then if you are single when you get home in the middle of the night and have to go inside your house where someone could be waiting between you and your gun.

It's awful easy for stalker to pattern someone who works regular.

This really stupid.

8 posted on 11/14/2004 5:27:10 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

I second that.

Is Whirlpool going to guarantee the employees' safety to, from, and at work?

How many other rights am I supposed to lose when I enter someone's personal property?


9 posted on 11/14/2004 5:27:46 PM PST by WhosJohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: timm22

Dude, you are way off.


10 posted on 11/14/2004 5:30:23 PM PST by WhosJohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: timm22

I see your point - but only up to a certain point. The employees should make it publicly known that the employer cares more about the possibility of a lawsuit than it does about the lives of their employees. Much like the pizza companies that won't allow their delivery drivers to be armed or the convenience store owners who leave their late-shift workers defenseless. In the last analysis, it's an individual decision. Ignore the company's silly rule and make a large public stink if they do happen to catch you and fire you for it. What's the old expression? "Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6"?


11 posted on 11/14/2004 5:31:49 PM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WhosJohnGalt
Is Whirlpool going to guarantee the employees' safety to, from, and at work?

Maybe timm22 might provide escorts.

12 posted on 11/14/2004 5:36:15 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

If a potentially violent employee knows that that many of his co-workers are armed and willing to stop him dead in his tracks...he very may well rethink his murderous plans and not go postal at Whirpool

The police (or perhaps just the police chief) agree with Whirl Pool's anti gun anti second amendment stand..

imo


13 posted on 11/14/2004 5:41:00 PM PST by joesnuffy ("The merit of our Constitution was, not that it promotes democracy, but checks it." Horatio Seymour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Thornton

Exactly. There must be some real commie gun-grabber types running policy at Whirlpool. Time for a consumer boycott of Whirlpool applicances to wake them up . . .


14 posted on 11/14/2004 5:53:05 PM PST by Iconoclast2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: timm22
workplace safety vs. gun owner's rights

First I would argue that, as in all cases, gun rights improve safety especially in the workplace. (I think we all agree on this but it doesn't hurt to repeat it.) Second, their property rights are being respected because this is not a law that allows them to carry into the building at work only the parking lot. If there is a private property rights issue it would arise from someone telling you what you can and can't keep in your own car. Many States have laws that treat parking lots that are private property but open to the public as public property in certain respects-- police ticketing handicapped parking violations for example.

Without this law, people are required to travel to and from work unarmed. Just think about your own daughter leaving a remote workplace at midnight and the issue takes on a whole new light.
15 posted on 11/14/2004 5:54:00 PM PST by Ragnorak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: timm22
"The focus should be on property rights. In my opinion, if I own a parking lot, I should be able to determine what things are allowed on that lot and which things are prohibited. I am against state-imposed gun control, but if someone doesn't want firearms on THEIR property, they should be allowed to make that decision. No one is forcing anyone to work for am anti-gun private employer."

And you would be wrong. "Your" property (the parking lot) begins at the outer skin of the automobile. Inside that skin is the private property of the owner of the vehicle. Only if he moves the firearm across that threshold have YOUR property rights been violated.

16 posted on 11/14/2004 5:56:03 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

In SC we have shall issue laws, and folks I have worked for have tried to say that we cannot carry guns in our cars.

I say if no one knows what is the issue.

If someone wants to search my car without a search warrant, I may lose my job, but I have my freedoms intact.

I've often wondered, for any legal folks out there, can my car be my property and then become my employers property once I drive onto their lot.

If my car remains my property on thier lot, it seems that I have the right to keep my gun on my property, as long as I am not breaking the law.


17 posted on 11/14/2004 6:01:28 PM PST by DanGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Who dreams up this stuff. It's totally FUBAR. Some of these jerks should read American history (well, probably they can't read anyway) and remember how this country was founded and settled. We've got 18 year old kids fighting for freedom on this planet, and some jack-ass has a problem with an American on our soil with a weapon. Give me a break. PATHETIC thinking. /rant

Now, where's my Sig? (just kidding).

18 posted on 11/14/2004 6:06:41 PM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Thornton
So, if you work for me and park in my lot, I can ban your car from displaying a John Kerry bumpersticker?

I don't know if you can, but you SHOULD be able to do so, yes. I don't have the right to drive my car onto your property.

Of course not, the First Amendment trumps my property rights.

So if I want to peacefully distribute KKK literature in someone's business or front yard, I should be able to do so?

19 posted on 11/14/2004 6:11:19 PM PST by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WhosJohnGalt
Dude, you are way off.

Care to elaborate?

20 posted on 11/14/2004 6:12:04 PM PST by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson