[Wonder Warthog]

"The focus should be on property rights. In my opinion, if I own a parking lot, I should be able to determine what things are allowed on that lot and which things are prohibited. I am against state-imposed gun control, but if someone doesn't want firearms on THEIR property, they should be allowed to make that decision. No one is forcing anyone to work for am anti-gun private employer."

And you would be wrong. "Your" property (the parking lot) begins at the outer skin of the automobile. Inside that skin is the private property of the owner of the vehicle. Only if he moves the firearm across that threshold have YOUR property rights been violated.

[timm22]

"Your" property (the parking lot) begins at the outer skin of the automobile. Inside that skin is the private property of the owner of the vehicle. Only if he moves the firearm across that threshold have YOUR property rights been violated.

So I guess I have the right to park my property on your front yard and camp out there overnight, just so long as I don't step off of my property and onto yours?

[Cobra64]

Warthog,

As in an A10?

Series, I've been TRYING to follow tim22's logic though this thread; but have found it is impossible. Sounds like a young liberal weasle who has never shot a weapon and lives in a totally isolated altruistic world on cloud-nine with a silver lining.

My children have more balls than this guy. They are both college graduates with karate black belts, have good jobs, no tattoos, piercings and straight!

Now on the other hand I think timm22 is on the flip side...