Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ScholarWarrior

Yes to all. BTW, mine is the SAME position as that of all orthodox Catholics.


370 posted on 11/13/2004 10:22:29 AM PST by narses (The fight to protect the unborn is THE civil rights battle of the 21st century. + Vivo Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]


To: narses; ScholarWarrior

Yes, to all of this?

***So you would outlaw in vitro fertilization for couples that have a hard time getting pregnant, or advance fertilization for couples undergoing cancer therapy that might want to have children in the future?

***The position you take is much farther than overturning Roe v. Wade.

***It means that an IUD is murder. And the day-after pill is murder. Right?

You are kidding, right?

If I told you that my sister had stem cell replacement, would you tell me she just should have died a lot earlier?


386 posted on 11/13/2004 10:28:59 AM PST by Howlin (I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Thanks for your honesty. I can respect that. I think your moral argument is consistent. It's just very difficult to implement legally and politically, and that's where we will disagree.


402 posted on 11/13/2004 10:38:13 AM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson