Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Rather Be Dumped? (We can only hope!)
IMDb.com ^ | 11-11-04

Posted on 11/11/2004 2:58:52 PM PST by Paul Atreides

CBS news reporters and staff are experiencing anxiety awaiting the release of the findings of an independing commission investigating the discredited 60 Minutes report by Dan Rather on Sept. 8 about George W. Bush's National Guard service, veteran Face the Nation anchor Bob Schieffer told today's (Thursday) Philadelphia Inquirer. "We're all apprehensive," Schieffer told the newspaper. "Nobody knows what this commission is going to find. Look, we made a terrible mistake. CBS has admitted it made a terrible mistake, and Dan [Rather, who fronted the report] has apologized. We take this very seriously, and some serious steps are going to have to be taken." Shieffer indicated that no decision about the "serious steps" is likely to be made until the commission's report is released. "I guarantee you that CBS will do whatever it takes to get our credibility back. If we don't have credibility, we'll cease to be. That's our coin of the realm," he said. The Inquirer cited internal rumors at the network that Rather may be asked to step down as CBS Evening News anchor. "Obviously, I'm concerned for Dan," Schieffer, a longtime friend, said. "He's holding up pretty well under the circumstances, but his situation has taken its toll, no question. How could it not?"


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Trepz

Exactly--fake but authentic was his actual response.


21 posted on 11/11/2004 3:09:59 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rang1995

Very clever rang; "if a tree falls in the forest" Watch CBS start cutting the dead lumber.

Something's in the air - BBC is cutting 50% of its employees....(what can they possibly do with 28,000 employees?) That's one per viewer!!!!


22 posted on 11/11/2004 3:10:26 PM PST by highflight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides

Will Rather ever honestly apologize about the forgeries and his role in the resulting scandal?


23 posted on 11/11/2004 3:11:27 PM PST by Malleus Dei ("Communists are just Democrats in a hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

That cartoon of Rather as the DNC's monkey would be funny if it wasn't true.


24 posted on 11/11/2004 3:12:17 PM PST by Malleus Dei ("Communists are just Democrats in a hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides

Has he always been as mentally unstable as he is now? I never watched him (my father wouldn't let me!) until a few times recently. What I see is a man who appears to be suffering from dementia.


25 posted on 11/11/2004 3:12:27 PM PST by elizabetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
'Bob Schieffer told today's (Thursday) Philadelphia Inquirer. "We're all apprehensive," Schieffer told the newspaper. "Nobody knows what this commission is going to find. Look, we made a terrible mistake."

A pathetic little man and Viacom Lap Dog.

Woof

26 posted on 11/11/2004 3:12:32 PM PST by Helms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

Rather apologized? Did I miss something? The only recent apology from CBS concerned last night's interruption of CSI to report the death of Arafat. BTW, I've been predicting Rather's departure from the CBS Evening News for more than a year, and the "60 Minutes" debacle is nothing more than convenient justification for the network to make the change. The Evening News has been mired in last place for more than a decade, costing CBS millions of dollars in revenue. The can push Rather out the door (along with his $10 million annual salary), put John Roberts or Scott Pelley in the anchor chair, pay them 80% less, and make $8 million more in the process. Stick a fork in Dan, he's done. Look for him to leave the evening news sometime in the spring--perhaps sooner.


27 posted on 11/11/2004 3:12:52 PM PST by Spook86 (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides

" If we don't have credibility, we'll cease to be."

--
Er, When has that ever been an impediment for the MSM?


28 posted on 11/11/2004 3:13:52 PM PST by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malleus Dei

29 posted on 11/11/2004 3:15:02 PM PST by Malleus Dei ("Communists are just Democrats in a hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides

"Look, we made a terrible mistake."

Mistake? Or told a really big lie? I certainly hope CBS 'ceases to be', it richly deserves such an ignominious demise. And lying should be synonomous with Dan Rather, like Clinton and interns...


30 posted on 11/11/2004 3:15:10 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempo

WHAT CREDIDABILTY?


31 posted on 11/11/2004 3:15:47 PM PST by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Malleus Dei

Blather won't apologize for the forgeries, when he thinks that they are true, in the first place.


32 posted on 11/11/2004 3:15:53 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides

Bob Scheiffer is more subtle than Rather, but just as wrong. Read this...just for fun.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/05/opinion/schieffer/main591350.shtml


33 posted on 11/11/2004 3:17:27 PM PST by YaYa123 (@More CBS BS..com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"I guarantee you that CBS will do whatever it takes to get our credibility back.

For starters, how about apologizing for decades of distorted news, political propaganda, and an obvious bias against Republicans?

34 posted on 11/11/2004 3:22:10 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

Reminds me of Janet Reno, when she said she took full responsibility for the Branch Davidian debacle, then stayed in office.


35 posted on 11/11/2004 3:24:07 PM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Look, we made a terrible mistake. CBS has admitted it made a terrible mistake, and Dan [Rather, who fronted the report] has apologized

That statement is a big steaming pile of Barbara Striesand! Dan never apologized, he just said the 'could not verify the authenticity' of the documents - then called out the President to 'answer the questions' posed in the documents.

Dan Rather is a far left liberal, and a cheerleader for the Democrat's and always has been - he now stands naked in the bright light of public exposure, however. Everyone can see what he stands for, and how bad he hates American freedom in general, and deeply loathes President Bush as a persn and a leader.

I hope CBS keeps Rather. Let him serve as a pillar and daily reminder to the American public of what a sleaze organization CBS news, and by extention, the broadcast news organizations are.

36 posted on 11/11/2004 3:24:18 PM PST by GaltMeister (Can I get me a terrorist huntin' license in hea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

I used to write for a college paper with a big circulation.

No way would we have used photocopies of important documents like CBS did. Their "experts" okay PHOTOCOPIES?

How can you verify a photocopied signature?

They also didn't check their source's story to see if his source really had access to the memos as was claimed. This is incredibly bad journalism.

You can't chalk this up to incompetence; this is a rush to make a name for themselves, hoping the WH would cave on the "evidence."


37 posted on 11/11/2004 3:25:37 PM PST by shot_gun_r (I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides

Nah - far too much seniority.


38 posted on 11/11/2004 3:28:58 PM PST by Paperdoll (on the cutting edge - OUR FIGHT HAS JUST BEGUN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty

I've never seen anyone look worse on television than Rather on election night. He was shaky, uncertain, biased, bullying to co-workers, etc.
Even if he hadn't revealed himself as a tool of the Democrats, why does the network continue to go with such an out-of-touch dinosaur?


39 posted on 11/11/2004 3:29:18 PM PST by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides

'Independing' - is that some weird concatenation of 'independent' and 'pending', or just a brain fart by the writer of this piece?


40 posted on 11/11/2004 3:33:16 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson