Really? Teaching students that the Secret Service doing its job to protect our President is evidence of the erosion of civil liberties is "harmless"? Planting the idea of killing the President in their minds and admonishing them not to send these emails, knowing that at least one of them will send it is "harmless"? Gratuitously alarming the Secret Service and causing taxpayers the expense of paying him a visit is "harmless"? Filling student minds with leftist propaganda on the taxpayer's dime is "harmless"? I think you and I have different definitions of "harmless."
How do you know that he did this "knowing that at least one of them will send it"? You don't. To write this post as if you did is dishonest.
_________________________________________
You wrote: Filling student minds with leftist propaganda on the taxpayer's dime is "harmless"?
There is nothing leftist about his assignment, a libertarian might have easily done the same. If you want to talk about some of his other activities that's something different but there is nothing in the original post, the one to which we replied, that even hints at "leftist propoganda"...try to color inside the lines.
______________________________
You wrote:I think you and I have different definitions of "harmless."
No, I think that I use the actual words and info in the post and you add whatever comes to mind as if it were fact.