Skip to comments.
Kerry hints White House run in his future: reports (It's over Johnny)
AFP ^
| Tue, Nov 09, 2004
Posted on 11/09/2004 10:47:20 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: presidio9
41
posted on
11/09/2004 11:58:45 AM PST
by
smith288
(I have posted over 10,000 times. The more I post, the more intelligent you become!)
To: per loin
They should limit the primaries in 2008 to those who have run before--McGovern, Carter, Mondale, Gore, and Kerry, and perhaps include those who failed to get the nomination like Biden, Babbitt, Bradley, Dean, Sharpton and Lieberman. The winner of the nomination would be the best of the worst.
To: presidio9
Kerry has deluded himself into thinking that he hasn't joined the McGovern/Mondale/Dukakis/Gore Irrelevancy club.
He'll be lucky to hang onto his Senate seat, in fact. ......and his meal ticket wife.
43
posted on
11/09/2004 12:01:01 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mr. Mojo
He'll be lucky to hang onto his Senate seat In Massachusettes? Not likely. Losing a presidential election never hurt Fat Teddy Kennedy. Then again, neither did murder.
44
posted on
11/09/2004 12:04:05 PM PST
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: presidio9
In Massachusettes? Not likely To another lib/Dem, not a Pubbie.
Losing a presidential election never hurt Fat Teddy Kennedy.
He lost in the primaries, not in the general election.
45
posted on
11/09/2004 12:14:47 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mr. Mojo
And he lost to the worst president in the country's history...Jimmah Cahtah. How embarrassing.
To: presidio9
Breaux told CNN television Monday, hinting that Kerry lacked the pizzazz to appeal to a broad-based public. You noticed.
Actually, great numbers of "broads" they expected to vote for him turned their backs on his pizzazz-free campaign. Nixed his alcohol-and-drug-addled wife as First Lady too.
47
posted on
11/09/2004 12:32:06 PM PST
by
Veto!
(Happy denizen of BushWorld)
To: presidio9
Of course this is assuming that his bag lady is still around to co-sign for any loans...
48
posted on
11/09/2004 12:34:39 PM PST
by
Hatteras
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
Hey, if you're gonna bring someone back, why not George McGovern? Jimmy Carter? Michael Dukakis? Walter Mondale?
Didn't they dust this guy off 2 years ago?
49
posted on
11/09/2004 12:42:16 PM PST
by
BlueMondaySkipper
(The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
To: Michael.SF.
Potential slogans:
We can't lose three in row!
The third time is the charm!
Two losers can be a winner!
Two wrongs make a right!
50
posted on
11/09/2004 12:44:45 PM PST
by
BlueMondaySkipper
(The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
To: presidio9
ROTFLMPO ...
The chances of this are even less than those of Hitlery winning in '08
But, anyway, JoKe, BRING IT ON!!!
Schadenfreude is a wonderful thing...
51
posted on
11/09/2004 1:12:34 PM PST
by
AFPhys
((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
To: BlueMondaySkipper
In 1984 Mondale lost everywhere except Minnesota (winning there by a microscopic margin) and the District of Columbia. In 2002 he managed to lose Minnesota in the Senate race, thus having a clean sweep of the states. Now if he will just run for an office in DC and get beat...
To: presidio9
3 words of advice for Kerry: Swift, boat, vets.
To: johnfkerrysucks
By conceding too quickly, you mean before january 2005, right?
54
posted on
11/09/2004 6:40:55 PM PST
by
texasflower
(Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
To: presidio9
Kerry will NOT get the nomination in 2008, that's one everybody can take to the bank. He may very well run, but he won't get the nod. The only reason he got it this time was by default, he was seen as "electable"--the dems thought his Vietnam background would innoculate him from the dems' achilles heel of being soft on defense.
Also--about 2/3rds of Kerry voters only voted for him because he wasn't Bush, not because of love for Kerry. Any other generic dem would have gotten the same amount of votes. Bush won't be on the ticket in 2008 to run against. Most of the dems couldn't give a rat's a$$ for him, and are mad because, like Al Gore, he blew an election that he should have resoundingly won. He won't have another shot at the big prize.
55
posted on
11/10/2004 12:29:09 AM PST
by
gop_gene
To: presidio9
He made a terrible mistake. He actually conceded! His party has decided that you ain't the President until the judges say you are or aren't and then you still argue for years that you were cheated! He is toast.
56
posted on
11/10/2004 12:39:40 AM PST
by
ladyinred
(Congratulations President Bush! Four more years!)
To: presidio9
"Kerry's younger brother Cameron told the Boston Globe newspaper the senator was "profoundly disappointed" about narrowly losing last week's election to President George W. Bush and deems another attempt fully possible.
"That's conceivable," the paper quoted the brother as saying. "I don't know why that (last week's loss) should necessarily be it."
What a hoot. He still doesn't get it. Robert Novak proposed "Is Kerry even Relevant?". His point being that the Dems really didn't care about Kerry or even what he took as positions during the campaign. They just wanted anyone but Bush. Kerry used the Dems, the Dems used Kerry. Kerry thinks he was picked because of him. He was picked because he was not Bush.
This is the height of delusion. He has started his long march to obscurity.
Mr Sol
To: Mr. Mojo
To another lib/Dem, not a Pubbie. Please. He has done nothing for 18 years and they keep electing him. They will all drink the kool-aid again. I was just up in Boston last weekend. They LOVE him up there.
58
posted on
11/10/2004 6:39:28 AM PST
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: presidio9
He must have enjoyed his candidacy more than we did.
59
posted on
11/10/2004 6:51:48 AM PST
by
altura
(Has Kerry taken off the yellow bracelet yet??)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson