Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paramount blames Alfie flop on election results
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/08/movies/MoviesFeatures/08box.html?ex=1100494800&en=9859d0549a8f4c0c&ei=5006&partner=ALTAVISTA1 ^

Posted on 11/07/2004 8:06:00 PM PST by joedownthestreet

Paramount's "Alfie," a remake of a romantic comedy about a roguish womanizer starring Jude Law, opened to a dismal $6.5 million in more than 2,000 theaters, far below expectations. The tepid response was the latest blow to Sherry Lansing, the chairwoman of Paramount who last week announced her plans to leave the job when her contract expires in 2005, and whose movies have performed poorly this summer and fall.

Wayne Llewellyn, the president of distribution at Paramount, said that the conservative ethos reflected in last week's election results might have hurt the film.

"It could be the mood of the country right now," he said. "It seems to be the result of the election. Maybe they didn't want to see a guy that slept around."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alfie; hollywood; movies; paramount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
It's all Bush's fault!!!
1 posted on 11/07/2004 8:06:00 PM PST by joedownthestreet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

Perhaps they wanted to see an original film.


2 posted on 11/07/2004 8:07:02 PM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

Shouldn't that read, "...Sherry Lansing, charwoman..."?


3 posted on 11/07/2004 8:07:59 PM PST by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarryCaul

or maybe they wanted to see a good movie.


4 posted on 11/07/2004 8:08:22 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (W04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

mmmm.... maybe the film just sucks??????


5 posted on 11/07/2004 8:08:41 PM PST by elephantman96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

As I pointed out on the Drudge-sourced thread on this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1273974/posts

Sarandon was in this turkey?
Well, this advice may be a bit late, but what the heck ...
______________

Rules for celebrities planning to trade on their celebrity
by taking a public position on a political issue:

1. Make sure you really have some celebrity status.

2. Plan to lose half of it.

3. Don't be surprised if you have no measurable influence.

4. Don't complain later about #2 and #3.

(1) You may discover, as Rosie and Cher did during the
Kerry campaign, that you are have fewer fans than you
imagined. If you have so few, you don't want to
discover it the hard way (#2).

(2) A silent film star was known for saying
"when a politician enters the room, I leave".
No matter what position you take, and no matter what
the outcome, if some issue is close enough that you
could make a difference, that means you are going to
annoy half your fan base, if not half of the general
population.

(3) Make sure that your fans are the kind of people
who actually make a difference in the world. Just
because they show up for you doesn't mean they vote.

(4) By "taking a stand", you are saying "this is so
important, I'm willing to bet my career on it". More
precisely, it's "I'm willing to blow half my audience".
Gambler's remorse is unbecoming for an esteemed figure
such as yourself. And if your horror is the discovery
that you had inflated celebrity and inept fans to
begin with, then we really don't want to hear about it.


6 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:08 PM PST by Boundless (Stopped sending money to Hollywood several years ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

They saw that Susan Sarandon was in it and they just froze over.


7 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:47 PM PST by wizardoz (straight, sedentary, and average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

Let's see; a movie about a self-centered abuser ... hmmm, not interested. The movie plot simply doesn't appeal to me, and it has nothing to do with how I voted.

Now, throw in some aliens, psychotic killers, and car chases ....

Given the competition (The Incredables - which truly lives and exceeds the hype!!) that is in movies right now; this movie is a garanteed box office bomb. I'm not even interested in the $1 rental.


8 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:48 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet
Gee...maybe everyone went to see "The Incredibles" a good family movie. You know...one you can actually take the kids too. Dumb hollywood types. They just can't get anything right....
9 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:56 PM PST by zlala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunkhead_01

wrong! chairPERSON... lol


10 posted on 11/07/2004 8:10:00 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

Is this a duplicate?

because I noted that "the INcredibles" did 70 million..


11 posted on 11/07/2004 8:10:36 PM PST by freedumb2003 (The cool points are out the window and you got me all twisted up in the game)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Very good post. Kudos on a well thought out, and painfully true essay.


12 posted on 11/07/2004 8:11:48 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

...no, charwoman, as in cleaning woman. She seems to be taking the investors to the cleaners.


13 posted on 11/07/2004 8:12:06 PM PST by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet
Since "The Incredibles" did $70.7 million nationwide over the weekend, it seems unlikely that people weren't in the mood to go see a movie. They just chose the better one. Go see "The Incredibles"!!
14 posted on 11/07/2004 8:12:15 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet
"It seems to be the result of the election. Maybe they didn't want to see a guy that slept around."

Would have been a smash during the Clinton years.

15 posted on 11/07/2004 8:12:41 PM PST by TexasNative2000 (When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

So if Kerry had won, 59 million Bush supporters WOULD have felt like seeing a movie about a womanizer?


16 posted on 11/07/2004 8:13:23 PM PST by madameguinot ("I've got political capital, and I'm going to spend it..." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz

Well, good point! I'm so bummed that Barbara Streisand is in Meet the Parents II. Just ruined it for me, and I won't go see it.


17 posted on 11/07/2004 8:15:11 PM PST by madameguinot ("I've got political capital, and I'm going to spend it..." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

Who needs to see a MOVIE about a womanizer,

One was elected twice to the highest office in the land.


18 posted on 11/07/2004 8:17:35 PM PST by Mr. Jazzy (Lets all see how many days Kerry shows up for his job in the Senate, NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet

About this thread: what's it all about?


19 posted on 11/07/2004 8:18:58 PM PST by Freepdonia (Victory is Ours! (I told you so :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joedownthestreet
Bad script, actors, dialog, production and direction usually are what makes a movie tank. That and the people having no desire to see a turkey.
20 posted on 11/07/2004 8:19:12 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson