1 posted on
11/04/2004 8:42:07 PM PST by
CedarDave
To: CedarDave
New Mexico was called yesterday...what about Iowa
2 posted on
11/04/2004 8:57:16 PM PST by
KMC1
To: CedarDave
Last I saw about 345 adobe ballots were still out
3 posted on
11/04/2004 8:59:10 PM PST by
woofie
To: CedarDave
This place can be unbelievable. I heard someone on the radio (Giron or some other muckity-muck) saying that it was difficult to get the results in from all over because NM is soooooo big.
Well, let's see...Texas? No problem. California? No problem. Alaska? No problem. Wyoming? No problem.
I guess what was really meant was "it takes time and effort to generate enough Democrat votes fraudulently without creating too much suspicion."
4 posted on
11/04/2004 9:01:48 PM PST by
Disambiguator
(Eschew the excessive utilization of multisyllabic terminology.)
To: CedarDave
Will W reach 60 million?!
To: CedarDave
It appears Richardson is doing his best to steal NM by dragging out the count.
6 posted on
11/04/2004 9:08:40 PM PST by
demlosers
To: CedarDave
But there were at least 19,500 uncounted paper ballots— so-called provisional and in-lieu-of ballots— statewide, according to a survey Thursday of most of New Mexico's 33 county clerks by The Associated Press.
19,500 uncounted paper ballots????? Richardson has had a couple of days to forge enough ballots for Kerry to win NM ... but that sounds like over-kill.
7 posted on
11/04/2004 9:09:57 PM PST by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
To: CedarDave
Dinky little state and it takes them forever to count a few votes? Hell, they better start now for the next election. Pitiful.
10 posted on
11/04/2004 9:23:44 PM PST by
Max Combined
(There is in human nature generally more of the fool than of the wise.)
To: CedarDave
Looks like my first impression was right, Dave.
The fix is on.
Richardson cannot afford to lose the political capital it would cost him by losing this state for Kerry, even if it doesn't effect the final outcome.
14 posted on
11/04/2004 10:07:53 PM PST by
CougarGA7
(Do you think Teressa is going to cut Johns allowance for not making her First Lady?)
To: CedarDave
W I I W N M ?
As they say in New Mexico Magazine...
"One of our 50 is missing"
It will be a National embarassment for Richardson
when they paint that state fire engine red.
:o)
To: CedarDave
27 posted on
11/05/2004 8:07:07 AM PST by
Ciexyz
(Bush still rules. The sun shines over America.)
To: CedarDave
Those provisional ballots would have to go over 71% for Kerry. If they did -- it would be prima facea evidence of voter fraud.
28 posted on
11/05/2004 8:08:17 AM PST by
AmishDude
(President Bush got 51 percent of the vote, a figure higher than that of any Democrat in 40 years.)
To: CedarDave
President Bush leading by 8,366 votes. But there were at least 19,500 uncounted paper ballots— Yep that's about the figure they figure they'd need - once they knew what "W"s lead was , to try to skew the results - but I wonder if Richardson will dare carry thru this time - as he did last time in "finding" a box of ballots with JUST ENOUGH to switch over to Gore...
32 posted on
11/05/2004 9:24:41 AM PST by
maine-iac7
( Pray without doubt..."Ask and you SHALL receive")
To: CedarDave
A couple of pics from this mornings Journal. Does the first one look familar (Florida 2000?):
Tanya Herrera, a Bernalillo County election worker, studies a voting machine tape in Albuquerque while being trained to work in the county's general election canvass.
Preparing for the count, election worker Tom Garrity loads a dolly with boxes of provisional ballots and voter rosters Thursday at the Bernalillo County Voting Machine Warehouse in Albuquerque.
(Wonder how easy it would be for a Rat worker to slip some extra packets of provisional votes into the pile?)
33 posted on
11/05/2004 9:47:05 AM PST by
CedarDave
(Served with pride alongside the Swifties, USCG patrol boat, Coastal Division 13, Viet Nam, 1967-68.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson