Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Devastating day for Democrats - They're in no mood to play nice on Hill
New York Daily News ^ | 11/04/04 | JAMES GORDON MEEK

Posted on 11/04/2004 1:33:32 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: Halgr
They have no clue why we fight them...why we believe they must be stopped...the very survival of America is at stake

Well to them the very survival of Amerika, and their gravy train is at stake. The reason the election tilted so favorably for the Socialist's in the begining is the ones that had a job had to vote in the afternoon, the welfare socialists all voted in the morning.

I think the Democrats are not voting for idealism other than the ideal of having someone else support your excesses.

41 posted on 11/04/2004 2:27:16 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"Since 1980, Democrats have tended to blame their losing candidates for not being tough enough. They somehow believe that their attacks on Republicans were not sufficiently sharp, and that Republicans are more focused on winning and more willing to do whatever it takes to win.

"I think this is nonsense generally, but especially so this year. There is no question that on the shrillness meter, Democrats have won hands-down. Democrat friends of mine maintain that George Bush drives them to it and that shrillness is the only way of breaking through the political stupor in which most Americans live.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1269787/posts?page=1


42 posted on 11/04/2004 2:28:14 AM PST by John Thornton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"We'll be throwing a lot of grenades," said one senior Democratic aide in the Senate. "With only 45 members, there'll be times when we can't filibuster, and we'll have to shine the spotlight on their outrageousness."

Fine, so in 2006, we'll have 60 seats in the Senate.

43 posted on 11/04/2004 2:32:16 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"So much for Kerry's little speech."


The problem with the Loser Party is that it has genuinely BAD people in it. Hence, any change will be a fraudulent change because genuinely bad people don't become genuinely good people at the drop of a political hat. Too many voters will see through this like they saw through Kerry's new "conservative" persona. IOW, the Loser Party needs truly to clean house, get rid of its corrupt leadership, not put on a new suit. Not likely though.


44 posted on 11/04/2004 2:37:03 AM PST by macamadamia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
A shining, brilliant example of one reason I am and will forever be a
Recovering_Democrat,
never to give that party a vote in any general election ever again.
45 posted on 11/04/2004 2:45:17 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"Several top Democratic aides blamed House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California and national party Chairman Terry McAuliffe for failing to win back the White House or either chamber of Congress."

I have secret data that proves this. I don't know how the democratic aides came into posession of it, but it's right on the money.


46 posted on 11/04/2004 2:47:32 AM PST by Rebelbase (Indiscriminate reprisals strengthen the terrorists. Targeted ones weaken them. Aim is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey
Are there any Democrats in the Senate who could break ranks??

I don't care if we pick up one, two or even three seats by someone switching parties.

I just want to make sure that Jeffords gets nothing.

47 posted on 11/04/2004 2:48:54 AM PST by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Edmund Burke

" the blacks"

That ought to be qualified. I know you are not a racist, but the statement appears to be that.


48 posted on 11/04/2004 2:49:08 AM PST by Rebelbase (Indiscriminate reprisals strengthen the terrorists. Targeted ones weaken them. Aim is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Some incredible quotes. These guys are melting.


49 posted on 11/04/2004 2:50:00 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
Will this be a repeat of 2000 ... where Dubya tried to make nice? Recall that his hand reached out to kennedy ... and the dim-0-crats spit on it - an obvious display of the "politics of personal destruction."

Will Dubya and the GOP ever learn their lesson ... ?

I doubt it - given Arlen's "shot across the bow" from yesterday. Simply no party discipline in the GOP - too many prima donnas - very, very old prima donnas!!!

50 posted on 11/04/2004 2:51:39 AM PST by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

I guess he did help get out the vote. The President got the most votes, EVER! but then, as Juan said on BO last night, if W got the most ever, sKerry got the next highest votes ever. .... Juan, he lost.


51 posted on 11/04/2004 2:55:29 AM PST by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

We have lots of good people, including J C. We just need to get them plenty of face time on TV, so that everyone will know who they are, not just us.


52 posted on 11/04/2004 2:57:08 AM PST by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; All

Interestingly enough, after the 2002 "earthquake election "
( somewhat obscure reference here: http://www.freedominion.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7588&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=165
)
...the Left's answer seemed to be "America is not hearing our message-- we need to SHOUT LOUDER!"

They haven't realized that we are hearing them fine- we just aren't buying the message.


53 posted on 11/04/2004 2:57:51 AM PST by backhoe ("We meet at Dawn- destiny Awaits...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77
The dems better realize that it is the left who is out of touch with mainstream America. The President was handed a mandate by conservatives, and they are the ones that should be setting the agenda. We have been given another chance to get rid of the vermin in this country, and I hope that we will not blow it. JC has our vote. He has the ability to put differences behind him and do what he can to help the country. I know from personal experience that he is a great guy. My daughter and some other Navy wives ran into him at Wendy's one day and he just stopped what he was doing and spent a lot of time trying to find out how he could help the military. If I could vote and vote often for JC Watts I would.
54 posted on 11/04/2004 2:58:59 AM PST by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I laughed at Alan last night. Sean had a copy of the new Red and Blue map - it is much more Red now. Alan was almost pouting - he said people DO live in the blue part, too.


55 posted on 11/04/2004 3:00:17 AM PST by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

that's probably the sad truth. A Zell Miller truth.


56 posted on 11/04/2004 3:01:08 AM PST by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kornev
Harold Ford Jr. would have been no better, in fact he is very dangerous, because he is a slick snake oil salesman. He would have you to believe that he comes from the middle, but if you know anything about his powerful politically corrupt family you would watch him very carefully.
57 posted on 11/04/2004 3:02:43 AM PST by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"McAuliffe is out - not a question," said one senior House aide.

No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

58 posted on 11/04/2004 3:05:50 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moconservative

See Spector bolt! He always bolts.


59 posted on 11/04/2004 3:07:05 AM PST by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kornev

They just don't get it, do they?

The more "grenades" they throw, the more they alienate the American people.

These folks are too STUPID to hold office.


60 posted on 11/04/2004 3:46:49 AM PST by Tilly (I'm not paid to be stressed!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson