Sorry to ask such a stupid question! It's just the author sounded so knowledgeable etc etc and then all of a sudden said "There are no sleeper cells"...
I mean, the 19 terrorists in the airplanes were here for quite some time before enacting their terrorist slaughter!
They didn't just hop over on a plane the week before.
Being the ignoramus that I am, I can only read and try to digest what other people say about all this. That's why I read this thread and appreciate your hard work so much.
That was my take as well lj. The first portion of the article seemed well written and well thought out. Then he stated there were no sleeper cells and I wondered what he was drinking or smoking. I'm at a loss to understand his state of denial. I assume it's denial, or he is a shill for someone or someone's agenda. I believe he is flat out wrong. Just my 2 cents.
What do you suppose his motivation in making such an assertion?