That was my take as well lj. The first portion of the article seemed well written and well thought out. Then he stated there were no sleeper cells and I wondered what he was drinking or smoking. I'm at a loss to understand his state of denial. I assume it's denial, or he is a shill for someone or someone's agenda. I believe he is flat out wrong. Just my 2 cents.
Right, I was reading along thinking "hmm, this guy seems like he's studying up pretty thoroughly on why people become terrorists" and then all of a sudden saying there are no sleeper cells now, in the past, or in the future!
It would be interesting to Google him and find out what else he says or what involvements he has.
I can't do anything on the internet until I get virus/spyware protection up, just got the computer back all fixed but it's all tender and unprotected, and I am a techno idiot.