Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

90-Day Mars Trip Said Possible
Discovery News ^ | Oct. 20, 2004 | By Irene Mona Klotz

Posted on 10/28/2004 8:49:44 AM PDT by vannrox

90-Day Mars Trip Said Possible

By Irene Mona Klotz, Discovery News

Oct. 20, 2004 — A team of University of Washington researchers believes it has found a way to cut roundtrip travel time between Earth and Mars by 95 percent, giving astronauts a much higher chance of pulling off a successful mission while minimizing their exposure to dangerous radiation.

"If it's going to take 2 1/2 years (to travel back and forth to Mars), the chances of a successful mission are pretty low," said project head Robert Winglee, a professor of Earth and space sciences at the Seattle-based university.

Taking a cue from the sun, Winglee has come up with a plan to beam magnetic particles, much like how solar wind particles stream from the sun, onto a spacecraft equipped with a magnetic sail. The craft would be pushed along as the particles repel from the sail.

Winglee envisions setting up beam generator on a space station that would send streams of magnetized ions toward the spacecraft's sail. The vehicle's speed would increase with the size of the plasma beam. For example, a beam generated by a 32-meter (105-foot) diameter nozzle would blast a spacecraft more than 26,000 mph or 625,000 miles per day.

Mars and Earth average about 48 million miles apart, though the distance at any one time can vary greatly, depending on where the planets are in their respective orbits around the sun. Winglee figures a spacecraft traveling on magnetic beams would take about 76 days for a one-way journey, but he's working on plans to shave even more time off the voyage.

Quicker travel times, however, would require a plasma station near the destination point to generate a force for braking.

The technology, called magnetized-beam plasma propulsion, or mag-beam, was among the projects under discussion this week at NASA's Institute of Advanced Concepts symposium in Seattle. The space agency this month gave Winglee's team a $75,000, six-month study contract, with the possibility of a two-year, $400,000 extension.

Winglee touts mag-beam technology as a way to open the solar system for exploration. With plasma generators placed around the solar system, spacecraft could sail from point to point, quickly and cleanly. A test mission could be ready to fly within five years, depending on funding.

"This would facilitate a permanent human presence in space," Winglee said. "That's what we are trying to get to."

Much work remains before mag-beam technology becomes practical, said Louis Friedman, executive director of the Pasadena, Calif.-based Planterary Society, which is preparing to launch a solar sail craft early next year.

The spacecraft taps the steady flow of solar wind particles beating against its sail to move.

"We didn't look at mag-beam for our mission. It's interesting, but it's an idea that is not very mature," said Friedman.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; engine; flight; future; gore; habitation; initative; kerry; landing; life; lives; mars; nasa; probe; robotic; rocket; space; time; travel; universe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
I WOULD LIKE FOR THIS TO BE TRUE...BUT IF KERRY GETS IN OFFICE, THEN WE CAN KISS OUR SWEET DREAMS OF A MARS LANDING...IN OUR LIVES...GOOD-BYE!
1 posted on 10/28/2004 8:49:47 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox

They should take the sort cut through the sun.


2 posted on 10/28/2004 8:51:15 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Thank you Rush Limbaugh-godfather of the New Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

This is a stretch..

I'm not sure how the human body could handle that accerleration.


3 posted on 10/28/2004 8:52:46 AM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

I can't help but wonder what would happen to the space station emitting this plasma beam: where would it end up after driving the spacecraft toward Mars?

Remember Sir Isaac's First Law...


4 posted on 10/28/2004 8:53:31 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

There is, however, the minor difficulty of coming back the same way....


5 posted on 10/28/2004 8:53:57 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Is there any science that says this is possible? Has there been any measurable push from any beam to date?


6 posted on 10/28/2004 8:54:11 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Actually, the acceleration would be quite gentle - it would just be constant which would result in much higher speeds than rocket technology can achieve.


7 posted on 10/28/2004 8:55:56 AM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox
There are several other hypothetical in shortening the time. One of the safety factors is to try to produce a powered flight as opposed to the thrust and then coast of the Moon shot. Sadly and incredibly the plans for the Apollo Saturn booster were to be destroyed through a treaty with the USSR--so if we needed the plans we would probably need to visit KGB HQ. There is also a dual thrust system using conventional and atomic power. the reactor would allow for power to super heated gasses (plasma) and also the reactor would power the craft thereby reducing the need for limited battery power source. (I stayed at a Holiday Inn express last night)
9 posted on 10/28/2004 8:58:21 AM PDT by sierrahome (Department of Redundancy Department)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox

what sweet dreams of mars??? I mean for God sake we havent saved those poor souls on gilligans Island yet.


11 posted on 10/28/2004 8:59:00 AM PDT by Walkingfeather (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

This guy's read the 'Mote in God's Eye' (although that was a laser beam).


12 posted on 10/28/2004 8:59:49 AM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Josh in PA

As long as there is a constant accelleration of 1G, they could get there much faster than 90 days. So the human body could easily survive the trip. However, the beam technology is suspect. The 'station' would not be able to maintain a stationary position if it's indeed sending a stream of plasma to the ship. That's simply not going to work. NASA is already working on plasma propulsion (I have a good friend working on plasma propulsion) which will be the way to explore our system. There is more than enough propulsion energy to get us around the solar system using plasma engines (like the impulse engines in Star Trek). Problem is, you need nuclear generators on the ship (like our subs have). Some people don't like nuke power in space. We *will* explore our system with manned missions, it is simply too important not too. I believe no matter who is president this will be true, but let's face it, we need to be fiscally responsible about our current spending. This is why I am very much in favor of privatization of space exploration (though we need military organization as well).


14 posted on 10/28/2004 9:03:02 AM PDT by iyaccom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox

OK, not really a techno geek, but if they are shooting magnetized particles at a sail, presumably it is attached to a ship with computers on board. Don't magnets and computer drives not play well together? Just a thought.


16 posted on 10/28/2004 9:05:12 AM PDT by Stag (I am the king of bad pick up lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

I'm not sure how the human body could handle that accerleration.

The acceleration is probably a few tenths of a G. A plain solar sail is about .01G.

What gives you the speed is the amount of time you apply that 0.2G. For a few minutes, you exceed the highway speed limit. For a few days, you get up into the tens of thousands of MPH.


17 posted on 10/28/2004 9:08:05 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

Also try Pournelle's Solar Sail Project. Short stories mixed with technical essays.

It may seem impractical now, but on the gripping hand, it is Crazy Eddie enough to work.


18 posted on 10/28/2004 9:11:00 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Someday it will be possible to go further than Mars.


19 posted on 10/28/2004 9:14:03 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Mars in 90 days, eh? Fine. Let that Virgin Airlines billionaire go for it (Bronson or whatever his name is).
20 posted on 10/28/2004 9:16:21 AM PDT by newgeezer (Democrats will cheat, steal, lie, do ANYTHING to win, because their noble goals justify every means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson