Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cgk

Does this mean that 11 of these trucks could have moved the "disappeared" explosives? Wrong kind of trucks but it's reasonable to suggest that equivalent flatbed trucks existed for Saddam's use.


249 posted on 10/27/2004 3:51:42 PM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961

Brit Hume said last night that it would take 28 trucks to move so much armament, each holding about 10 tons each...


261 posted on 10/27/2004 3:53:13 PM PDT by luvie (WE WILL NOT WAVER; WE WILL NOT TIRE; WE WILL NOT FALTER; AND WE WILL NOT FAIL!!! RE-ELECT GWB!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961
Does this mean that 11 of these trucks could have moved the "disappeared" explosives?


Here's what Global Security has to say on the subject of how it could've "gone missing":

According to the Sept. 27 Washington Post, several experts have noted that removal of such large quantities -perhaps upwards of 400 tons- would be logistically quite difficult. For instance, even with heavy trucks, several dozen vehicles would be required.


(And I can't find the "Sept 27 wash post" article they're discussing - a month previous to this "story")
276 posted on 10/27/2004 3:55:22 PM PDT by cgk (I'll keep posting it until you READ IT. Pay attention!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson