I found this gem with a Lexis-Nexis search.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: Prince Charles; All
This needs to be sent out asap..
2 posted on
10/26/2004 12:31:49 PM PDT by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: Prince Charles
3 posted on
10/26/2004 12:32:24 PM PDT by
The G Man
(George W. Bush: "Got wood?")
To: Prince Charles
WOW! That means the the place was EMPTY BEFORE THE WAR EVEN STARTED!!!!!!!!!!!THIS IS HUGE!!!!!!!NYT IS A WHORE FOR KERRY!!!!!!
4 posted on
10/26/2004 12:32:44 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Ask not for whom the Freeper freeps, they freep for thee........)
To: stockpirate
5 posted on
10/26/2004 12:32:53 PM PDT by
The G Man
(George W. Bush: "Got wood?")
To: Prince Charles
Now now. We all know they moved 380 tons of ammo back into the facility after the UN left.
Then it was stolen by a carvan of Bedouin.
6 posted on
10/26/2004 12:32:57 PM PDT by
Rutles4Ever
("...upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.")
To: Prince Charles; Mo1
Mohamed El Baradei's report to the UN security council
Friday February 14, 2003
We have also continued to investigate the relocation and consumption of the high explosive HMX. As I reported earlier, Iraq has declared that 32 tonnes of the HMX previously under IAEA seal had been transferred for use in the production of industrial explosives, primarily to cement plants as a booster for explosives used in quarrying.
Iraq has provided us with additional information, including documentation on the movement and use of this material, and inspections have been conducted at locations where the material is said to have been used. However, given the nature of the use of high explosives, it may well be that the IAEA will be unable to reach a final conclusion on the end use of this material. While we have no indication that this material was used for any application other than that declared by Iraq, we have no technical method of verifying, quantitatively, the declared use of the material in explosions. We will continue to follow this issue through a review of civilian mining practices in Iraq and through interviews of key Iraqi personnel involved in former relevant research and development activities.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,895890,00.html
7 posted on
10/26/2004 12:34:31 PM PDT by
Howlin
(Bush has claimed two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
To: Prince Charles
Hello,
Wow! This needs to be sent to the RNC, ASAP. Is it possible to determine if this info was truly "reported" by the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, or if they picked up a feed from another source?
Glad to be here, MOgirl
8 posted on
10/26/2004 12:35:32 PM PDT by
MOgirl
(In memory of Walton Wayne Callahan, I love you forever.)
To: Prince Charles
Nice. Broadcast it to the blogosphere and Drudge. You can still make "Best of the Web."
10 posted on
10/26/2004 12:35:53 PM PDT by
Callahan
To: Prince Charles
I really miss Lexis-Nexis. Great find, but the story was out of the box yesterday, and the NYT is still reporting on Monday morning's news. Gotta love the MSM.
11 posted on
10/26/2004 12:36:22 PM PDT by
kingu
(Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
To: Prince Charles
Why would America leave the security of it's country up to the United Nations?
All members in Congress and the Senate are killing Americans by supporting the United Nations.
TREASON
13 posted on
10/26/2004 12:36:34 PM PDT by
watchout
To: Prince Charles
Hmm... I guess the New York Slimes doesn't have access to Lexis-Nexis... </sarcasm>
This just proves how little investigative journalism took place to "break" this story a week before the election. Prince Charles, how long did it take you to dig up this gem?
14 posted on
10/26/2004 12:36:49 PM PDT by
reegs
To: Prince Charles
I found this gem with a Lexis-Nexis search. I'm guessing that the NYTimes has Lexis-Nexis capability and overlapping layers of accountability.
Oh well. Chalk up another one for the pajamahadeen.
15 posted on
10/26/2004 12:37:31 PM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Prince Charles
I found this gem with a Lexis-Nexis search.You're a real prince. :oD
16 posted on
10/26/2004 12:37:38 PM PDT by
alnick
(Vote for Dubya like your life depends on it.)
To: Prince Charles
To: Prince Charles
Turn out the lights....
The PARTY'S OVER!!!!
To: Prince Charles
20 posted on
10/26/2004 12:38:32 PM PDT by
cgk
(Hitchens: USA worth fighting for, needs to be defended unapologetically against the forces of jihad)
To: Prince Charles
Finding "nothing" would seem to indicate that they didn't find what they were looking for, i.e. WMD.
Multiple other reports state that the seals on the bunkers containing the high explosives were still in place at the time of this inspection. In other words, this article doesn't establish that the explosives weren't there in March 2003, and various others say they were.
21 posted on
10/26/2004 12:38:50 PM PDT by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: Prince Charles
22 posted on
10/26/2004 12:38:53 PM PDT by
Tuxedo
(Real friends don't let friends vote Democrat.)
To: Prince Charles
SEND IT TO DRUDGE.. SEND IT TO SEAN.. SEND IT TO THE RNC.. SEND IT TO FOX..
Send this to everybody people.
To: Prince Charles
Not to rain on the parade here but, it appears that the statement "but found nothing" is contextually referring to weapons of mass destruction.
26 posted on
10/26/2004 12:40:41 PM PDT by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson