Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Covers Came off O'Reilly Sex Scandal (Behind-the-scenes look)
New York Daily News ^ | 10/12/04 | RICHARD T. PIENCIAK

Posted on 10/24/2004 2:52:44 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: Gibtx
o is a pervert

Oh, come on. Lots of guys fantasize and have phone sex. Now he may be a cheat. Sure. A bloviator? Okay. A sexual harasser? Maybe. A perv? Unlikely

61 posted on 10/24/2004 5:34:41 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

my opinion he is a pervert


62 posted on 10/24/2004 5:39:58 PM PDT by Gibtx (Pajamahadien call to arms.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Gibtx

He could be a pervert, I don't know. But if it's phone sex that makes him that then there are a lot of perverts out there.


63 posted on 10/24/2004 5:44:05 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
it is my opinion
64 posted on 10/24/2004 5:48:17 PM PDT by Gibtx (Pajamahadien call to arms.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Could not agree more! She could have hung up and stopped the stupid behaviour. She is worse than him; this is obviously an attempt to grab a huge sum of money.

That she would put something that she could have stopped before O'Reilly's family is reprehensible; she is beneath contempt.

65 posted on 10/24/2004 5:50:36 PM PDT by Constitution1st (Never, never, never quit - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Constitution1st

My daughter says that she has made herself the next Monica Lewinsky.


66 posted on 10/24/2004 5:53:48 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

I have noticed on his television and this radio show that he has said sexual things that I thought were inappropriate. How could he be so stupid given his success, that he would allow himself in such a situation?


67 posted on 10/24/2004 5:58:53 PM PDT by Vicki (Truth and Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
My daughter says that she has made herself the next Monica Lewinsky.

I agree with your daughter. If this gal has been in with Al Franken, then it was a concerted effort to take O'R's Achilles Heel (like Rush's), and bring him down. This gal is just another Mattress Intern who will be hawking handbags in the future. In the meantime, "Mission Accomplished" on politics of personal destruction. In the interest of full disclosure, I've heard some of O'R's comments about and to women on the air and find them over the line.....some of his political comments are as well.
68 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:44 PM PDT by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Constitution1st

First of all, O'Reilly's inflated ego has really begun to grate on me in the past year but my respect for him grew when this "scandal" hit, because he refused to pay 60 million dollars (he claims) for the woman's silence, and turned around and sued her for extortion.

Secondly, I think many here are too rough on the guy - who knows if Makris came on to him, or if it was a mutual attraction... or WHAT? We don't know what their relationship was, and we don't know what the truth is. Nor do we know what O'Reilly's relationship with his wife is - nor, frankly, is it any of our business.

Now, paint me naive, but even if BO'R is completely "guilty" of (gasp!) off-color comments and suggestions of phone sex... well, in my opinon ... SO WHAT? Unless he said: "Sleep with me, wench, or your job is toast!" I don't see where there's even any "there" there... particularly since she came back to work for BO'R after the "harassment" was said to have occurred. But I'm not a lawyer... perhaps it's illegal to say things to co-workers like "You look beautiful today" (certainly, one poster here thinks that's the case with Lis Wiehl).

Finally... a question... RE Tapes of BO'R's phone conversations (if there ARE tapes...) ... depending on whatever state this occurred in, wouldn't recording these conversations be illegal - since O'Reilly obviously didn't know he was being recorded (IF he was being recorded) ... and, if that's the case, how could such recordings possibly be used in any kind of legal battle?


69 posted on 10/24/2004 6:07:53 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Did you see the interview that he did with Cheryl Tiegs? I was appalled at how full of himself he was. He remarked at how Cheryl Tiegs keeps herself in such good shape and that he couldn't do that, that she would know if she could see him in a bathing suit. The image was gross, he's not exactly Mr. Body Beautiful.


70 posted on 10/24/2004 6:10:06 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Another liberal bites the dust.


71 posted on 10/24/2004 6:12:22 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

No, I didn't see that interview but a couple of other times, I've heard him talking with women in a "greasy" kind of way....lost interest in him when he seemed to be doing it so often and so effortlessly.


72 posted on 10/24/2004 6:21:51 PM PDT by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Eva
"she would know if she could see him in a bathing suit. The image was gross, he's(Bill) not exactly Mr. Body Beautiful." ----------------------------------------------------------- How most talk radio male hosts view themselves...LOL (evil grin)
73 posted on 10/24/2004 6:26:34 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

I lost interest in O'Reilly about the time that he launched his radio show and it became obvious that he was marketing himself to pick of the listeners that wouldn't be interested in Rush. He sees himself as in competition with Rush and he's just not in the same league. He's not as smart.


74 posted on 10/24/2004 6:34:31 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

"Again there is no book about O'Reilly/Fox News authored by Mackris."

Book or no book that gal is not credible!
Obvious that she either/or wanted 15 minutes of fame
to bribe O'Reily for $'s and bring him down. Not totally convinced she is acting alone in this either.


75 posted on 10/24/2004 6:36:01 PM PDT by Gimme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Gimme
Book or no book that gal is not credible!

And O'Reilly is not a saint. He needs to practice what he preaches. If not it can come back to bite yah.

76 posted on 10/24/2004 6:52:37 PM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Gibtx
He is definitely a phony. I have tuned him out ever since he tried to take advantage of Rush's loss of hearing.

You freep what you sow.
77 posted on 10/24/2004 7:19:56 PM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

"And O'Reilly is not a saint. He needs to practice what he preaches. If not it can come back to bite yah."

Don't get me wrong, O'Reilly is not my favorite show, he got all puffed up with himself, so I stopped watching but I truly feel that this gal had an agenda to do him harm and I would not be surprised to learn later that the effort was pushed by someone else lurking in the wings.


78 posted on 10/24/2004 9:18:03 PM PDT by Gimme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Gibtx

bttt


79 posted on 10/25/2004 6:04:20 AM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Constitution1st
She could have hung up and stopped the stupid behaviour. She is worse than him; this is obviously an attempt to grab a huge sum of money. That she would put something that she could have stopped before O'Reilly's family is reprehensible; she is beneath contempt.

He's the CELEBRITY with the reputation to lose. She's a NOBODY who might collect big bucks and will be happy. His family is not her concern. It should have been his concern before he phone-sexed her.

80 posted on 10/25/2004 6:15:39 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson