What really gets me is his phoniness about hunting. I don't care one way or another if Bush hunts. It is irrelevant. As long as he defends gun rights I don't if he even owns one. Kerry, on the other hand, has a history of anti-gun votes and thinks hunters are so freaking stupid we will buy into his idiotic claims about crawling around on the ground with a shotgun, hunting for deer. It's not whether he hunts or not, it's that he thinks hunters are so ignorant they can be bought with such inept lies. Actually, I wouldn't vote for Kerry even if he had a good record on gun rights, so what's the difference.
bump
Let your neighbors know the Kerry record. (per gun control)
It really makes a difference!
I'm not a gun owner and I don't hunt but I strongly support the 2nd Amendment. Why? Because the 2nd Amendment really has little to do with hunting. Its purpose is to ensure that the people have the means to take back to government from a tyrant should that ever become necessary.
Still, I'm more than happy that GWB has the support of hunters.
This article on CNN Money proves your point on Candidates and toys. CNN using the shotgun given to Kerry in WV. All mirrors and illusions.
http://money.cnn.com/2004/10/14/pf/goodlife/candidates_toys/index.htm
I'm not a hunter, just a guy with lots of guns :)
RKBA is not about hunting. Kerry is an ass.
Third time posted.